Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25313348›Full record

ArticleCurrent developmental disorders reports2014

Motor-based intervention protocols in treatment of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS).

Edwin Maas, Christina Gildersleeve-Neumann, Kathy J Jakielski, Ruth Stoeckel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current developmental disorders reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05675306 (Dose Frequency Randomized Control Trial for Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05675306 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Dose Frequency Randomized Control Trial for Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing (DTTC) Treatment for Childhood Apraxia of Speech

TypeinterventionalSponsorMarquette UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsChildhood Apraxia of SpeechArmsDynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for childhood apraxia of speech.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Direction of attentional focus in biofeedback treatment for /r/ misarticulation.International journal of language & communication disorders · 2016
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Articulatory Control in Childhood Apraxia of Speech in a Novel Word-Learning Task.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Edwin MaasDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Arizona, 1131 East Second Street, PO Box 210071, Tucson, AZ 85721-0071, .
Christina Gildersleeve-NeumannSpeech and Hearing Sciences Department, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97207-0751, .
Kathy J JakielskiCommunication Sciences and Disorders, Augustana College, 639 38 Street, Rock Island, IL 61201, .
Ruth StoeckelDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, .
Augustana College · USMayo Clinic · USPortland State University · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

Psycholinguistic Investigations of Development and Disorders of Speech ProductionK01DC010216 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI MAAS, EDWIN · 2010 to 2014
$689k
NIDCD NIH HHS K01 DC010216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper reviews current trends in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech (CAS), with a particular emphasis on motor-based intervention protocols. The paper first briefly discusses how CAS fits into the typology of speech sound disorders, followed by a discussion of the potential relevance of principles derived from the motor learning literature for CAS treatment. Next, different motor-based treatment protocols are reviewed, along with their evidence base. The paper concludes with a summary and discussion of future research needs.

Identifiers

PMID25313348
PMCPMC4192721
OpenAlexW2081025887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.