Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25313052›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Transfer of noncoding DNA drives regulatory rewiring in bacteria.

Yaara Oren, Mark B Smith, Nathan I Johns, Millie Kaplan Zeevi, Dvora Biran, Eliora Z Ron, Jukka Corander, Harris H Wang, Eric J Alm, Tal Pupko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Novel Fosfomycin Resistance Mechanism inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genome-Wide Association Study ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yaara OrenDepartments of Cell Research and Immunology and.
Mark B SmithMicrobiology Graduate Program and.
Nathan I JohnsDepartment of Systems Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032;
Millie Kaplan ZeeviDepartments of Cell Research and Immunology and.
Dvora BiranMicrobiology and Biotechnology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel;
Eliora Z RonMicrobiology and Biotechnology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel; MIGAL, Galilee Research Institute, Kiryat Shmona 11016, Israel; and.
Jukka CoranderDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FIN-00014, Finland.
Harris H WangDepartment of Systems Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032;ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2164-4318
Eric J AlmDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; ejalm@mit.edu talp@post.tau.ac.il.
Tal PupkoDepartments of Cell Research and Immunology and ejalm@mit.edu talp@post.tau.ac.il.

Funding

Functional Metagenomic Reprogramming of the Human Microbiome through Mobilome EngDP5OD009172 · OD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI WANG, HARRIS H · 2011 to 2015
$2.0M
NIH HHS 1DP5OD009172-01NIH HHS DP5 OD009172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms that generate variation is a common pursuit unifying the life sciences. Bacteria represent an especially striking puzzle, because closely related strains possess radically different metabolic and ecological capabilities. Differences in protein repertoire arising from gene transfer are currently considered the primary mechanism underlying phenotypic plasticity in bacteria. Although bacterial coding plasticity has been extensively studied in previous decades, little is known about the role that regulatory plasticity plays in bacterial evolution. Here, we show that bacterial genes can rapidly shift between multiple regulatory modes by acquiring functionally divergent nonhomologous promoter regions. Through analysis of 270,000 regulatory regions across 247 genomes, we demonstrate that regulatory "switching" to nonhomologous alternatives is ubiquitous, occurring across the bacterial domain. Using comparative transcriptomics, we show that at least 16% of the expression divergence between Escherichia coli strains can be explained by this regulatory switching. Further, using an oligonucleotide regulatory library, we establish that switching affects bacterial promoter architecture. We provide evidence that regulatory switching can occur through horizontal regulatory transfer, which allows regulatory regions to move across strains, and even genera, independently from the genes they regulate. Finally, by experimentally characterizing the fitness effect of a regulatory transfer on a pathogenic E. coli strain, we demonstrate that regulatory switching elicits important phenotypic consequences. Taken together, our findings expose previously unappreciated regulatory plasticity in bacteria and provide a gateway for understanding bacterial phenotypic variation and adaptation.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalDNA, BacterialEscherichia coliGenome, BacterialRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidSpecies SpecificityDNA, Bacterialbacterial evolutioncore genesHRTregulatory evolution

Identifiers

PMID25313052
PMCPMC4234569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.