ArticleHNO2014
[Respiratory epithelial adenomatoid hamartoma of the nose and nasal sinuses : a rare differential diagnosis of nasal polyposis].
Article in HNO, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and Molecular Presentation of Respiratory Epithelial Adenomatoid Hamartoma: A Systematic Review.American journal of rhinology & allergy · 2026Pooled it
- Lateral Nasal Wall Respiratory Epithelial Adenomatoid Hamartoma (REAH): A Diagnostic Conundrum.Iranian journal of otorhinolaryngology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHamartomas are benign tumor-like lesions resulting from incorrectly differentiated germplasm and can manifest in different organ systems. In the nasal cavity and the sinuses these lesions are rare. Only few data on etiology, epidemiology and clinical significance of these tumors exist to date. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn a retrospective study, material from patients treated in the Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery of the Ulm Military Hospital was screened on the incidence and clinical courses of respiratory epithelial adenomatoid hamartomas (REAH) of the nose and nasal cavity. Furthermore, for cases of REAH, formalin-fixated paraffin-embedded tissue samples were re-evaluated and examined for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA by PCR.
resultsTissue samples from 8145 surgical interventions on the nose and nasal sinuses from 2003 to 2012 were included. A total of 22 patients (3 female, 19 male; median age 57.5 years) diagnosed with REAH could be identified. Major complaints were nasal blockage (91 %), sinusitis (82 %), rhinorrhea (36 %) and cephalgia (23 %). Nasal endoscopy showed polyps in 68 % of patients. Native nasal sinus CT scans revealed no indications of REAH. Intraoperatively, hamartomas were found in 12 patients originating from the ethmoid bone, in 8 from the middle meatus or infundibulum and in 2 from the olfactory cleft. Macroscopic and histological examination showed compact lesions sized between 4 and 25 mm in the largest diameter containing homologous tissue, without signs of dysplasia or malignancy. HPV DNA was not identified in any case.
conclusionREAH of the nasal cavity and sinuses are rare benign local tissue lesions, usually without any autonomous proliferation. Clinical signs and findings correspond to those in polypoid pansinusitis. Only with single-sided or olfactory cleft location might CT scans provide indication of a tumorous lesion. For differentiation from true neoplasms, surgical resection and histopathological clarification is indicated. On the basis of current knowledge, complete surgical resection is adequate therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.