ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2015
Follow-up endoscopy for benign-appearing gastric ulcers has no additive value in detecting malignancy: It is time to individualise surveillance endoscopy.
Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality indicators for upper GI endoscopy.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Guideline
- Medical versus surgical treatment for refractory or recurrent peptic ulcer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Development and validation of a real-time AI model for differentiating benign and malignant gastric ulcers : a multicenter retrospective study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Factors Associated with Malignant Gastric Ulcers: A 10-year Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Re-evaluating Gastric Ulcer Re-evaluation: Low Malignancy Yield and High Cost in a 19-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Article
- When Cancer Erupts: Recognizing the Volcano Lesion in Gastric Metastases.ACG case reports journal · 2025Article
- Quality Indicators for Upper GI Endoscopy.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Article
- [Approach for the Management of Indefinite-for-neoplasia Lesions Detected on Gastric Mucosal Biopsy].The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2023Review
- Risk stratifying gastric ulcers: development and validation of a scoring system.Frontline gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Differentiation Between Malignant and Benign Endoscopic Images of Gastric Ulcers Using Deep Learning.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Role of gastroscopic biopsy of gastric ulcer margins and healed sites in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer: A clinical controlled study of 513 cases.Oncology letters · 2018Article
- Changing Aetiology of Perforated Peptic Ulcers: Rising Impact of Non-Steroidal-Anti-Inflammatories in Western Australia.ANZ journal of surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic follow-up for gastric ulcers.
methodsAll cases of gastric ulcers diagnosed at our teaching hospital between September 2005 and November 2011 were reviewed. The cases were selected by using ENDOBASE, an endoscopy documentation system. The characteristics of the ulcers and their histology were analysed.
resultsDuring the study period 321 cases with a gastric ulcer were diagnosed, including 214 benign ulcers (67 %) and 107 malignant ulcers (33 %). The mean age of the population was 71 years. In 200 patients (62 %) the ulcers were classified as benign appearing at the first endoscopy. However, in five of these patients, the ulcers eventually were malignant. In all of these five patients the index gastroscopy revealed a non-benign histology. Therefore, the sensitivity of a benign appearance of the ulcer in combination with histology at the first endoscopy is 100 % to rule out malignancy. In 121 patients (38 %) the ulcers were explicitly labelled as potentially malignant in the report of the first endoscopy. Of these potentially malignant-appearing ulcers, 102 (84 %) were indeed malignant as confirmed by histology. The other 19 ulcers (16 %) were benign at follow-up. The sensitivity of the three potential malignant characteristics at endoscopy was: dirty base 79 %, elevated border 94 % and irregular border 91 %. The specificity was 93, 82 and 89 %, respectively. The median diameter of the ulcers was significantly higher in the malignant group compared to the benign ulcer group (p < 0.0001). The accuracy of endoscopic malignancy diagnosis was as follows: sensitivity of 0.98 and specificity 0.84, positive predictive value 0.84 and negative predictive value 0.98. In total, 546 gastroscopies were performed in these 321 patients, of which 225 were follow-up endoscopies. By not monitoring ulcers considered benign in both appearance and histology, 173 gastroscopies would not have been performed, resulting in a decline of 77 % of the follow-up endoscopies performed.
conclusionEndoscopic follow-up of gastric ulcers considered benign by appearance and with benign histology showed no additive value in detecting unsuspected malignancy in this study. This strategy could reduce health costs and save distress to patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.