Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25311876›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2014

Obstetrician-gynecologists' knowledge of sickle cell disease screening and management.

Ijeoma C Azonobi, Britta L Anderson, Vanessa R Byams, Althea M Grant, Jay Schulkin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Sickle Cell Education: A Survey of Antenatal Healthcare Givers.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The current state of sickle cell trait: implications for reproductive and genetic counseling.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2018
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ijeoma C Azonobi
Britta L Anderson
Vanessa R Byams
Althea M Grant
Jay SchulkinThe American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC, USA. JSchulkin@acog.org.
American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USMorehouse School of Medicine · USNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities · US

Funding

Research Training & Career Development ProgramU54CA118638 · NCI · MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Brian M. Rivers · 2005 to 2026
$22.7M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA118638PHS HHS UA6MC19010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYNs) play an important role in sickle cell disease (SCD) screening and patient care, there is little information on knowledge of SCD or sickle cell trait (SCT) or related practices in this provider group. Our objective was to assess SCD screening and prenatal management practices among OB/GYNs.

methodsTwelve hundred Fellows and Junior Fellows of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (the College)a were invited to complete a mailed survey, of which half (n = 600) belonged to the Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network.b Participants answered questions regarding appropriate target patient groups for prenatal SCD screening, folic acid requirements, practice behaviors and adequacy of their medical school and residency training.

resultsA total of 338 CARN members (56.3%) and 165 non-CARN members (27.5%) returned a survey. Of the 503 responders, 382 provided obstetric services and were included in the analyses. Forty percent of these respondents (n = 153) reported seeing at least 1 patient with SCD in the last year. Of these, 97.4% reported regularly screening people of African descent for SCD or SCT, whereas 52.9% reported regularly screening people of Mediterranean descent and 30.1% reported regularly screening people of Asian descent. Only 56.2% knew the correct recommended daily dose of folic acid for pregnant women with SCD. The proportion of respondents that rated training on SCD screening, assessment and treatment as barely adequate or inadequate ranged from 19.7% to 39.3%.

conclusionsThe practice of many OB/GYNs who care for patients with SCD are not consistent with the College Practice Guidelines on the screening of certain target groups and on folic acid supplementation. There may be an opportunity to improve this knowledge gap through enhanced medical education.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceGynecologyObstetricsAfricaAnemia, Sickle CellAsiaEducation, MedicalFellowships and ScholarshipsFemaleFolic AcidHumansMaleMass ScreeningMediterranean RegionMiddle AgedPregnancyFolic AcidVitamin B Complex

Identifiers

PMID25311876
PMCPMC4287569
OpenAlexW1992739229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.