Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25311838›Full record

ArticleHepatology (Baltimore, Md.)2015

Differential effects of targeting Notch receptors in a mouse model of liver cancer.

Erik G Huntzicker, Kathy Hötzel, Lisa Choy, Li Che, Jed Ross, Gregoire Pau, Neeraj Sharma, Christian W Siebel, Xin Chen, Dorothy M French

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Hepatocellular carcinoma: signaling pathways and therapeutic advances.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The Role of Inflammation in Cholestatic Liver Injury.Journal of inflammation research · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erik G HuntzickerPathology Department Biomarker Group, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA.
Kathy Hötzel
Lisa Choy
Li Che
Jed Ross
Gregoire Pau
Neeraj Sharma
Christian W Siebel
Xin Chen
Dorothy M French
Gilead Sciences (United States) · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

UCSF Liver Core CenterP30DK026743 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Holger Willenbring · 1986 to 2026
$30.7M
Molecular Genetics of Liver CancersR01CA136606 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHEN, XIN · 2009 to 2016
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA136606NCI NIH HHS R01CA136606NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK026743NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK026743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledPrimary liver cancer encompasses both hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). The Notch signaling pathway, known to be important for the proper development of liver architecture, is also a potential driver of primary liver cancer. However, with four known Notch receptors and several Notch ligands, it is not clear which Notch pathway members play the predominant role in liver cancer. To address this question, we utilized antibodies to specifically target Notch1, Notch2, Notch3, or jagged1 (Jag1) in a mouse model of primary liver cancer driven by v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog and neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog (NRas). We show that inhibition of Notch2 reduces tumor burden by eliminating highly malignant HCC- and CCA-like tumors. Inhibition of the Notch ligand, Jag1, had a similar effect, consistent with Jag1 acting in cooperation with Notch2. This effect was specific to Notch2, because Notch3 inhibition did not decrease tumor burden. Unexpectedly, Notch1 inhibition altered the relative proportion of tumor types, reducing HCC-like tumors but dramatically increasing CC-like tumors. Finally, we show that Notch2 and Jag1 are expressed in, and Notch2 signaling is activated in, a subset of human HCC samples.

conclusionsThese findings underscore the distinct roles of different Notch receptors in the liver and suggest that inhibition of Notch2 signaling represents a novel therapeutic option in the treatment of liver cancer.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalcium-Binding ProteinsDisease Models, AnimalForkhead Box Protein M1Forkhead Transcription FactorsHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsJagged-1 ProteinLiver NeoplasmsMembrane ProteinsMiceProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Receptors, NotchSerrate-Jagged ProteinsCalcium-Binding ProteinsForkhead Box Protein M1Forkhead Transcription FactorsFoxm1 protein, mouseIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsJAG1 protein, humanJag1 protein, mouseJagged-1 ProteinMembrane ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Receptors, NotchSerrate-Jagged Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25311838
PMCPMC4447303
OpenAlexW1966685737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.