Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25311347›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2014

Management of familial cancer: sequencing, surveillance and society.

Nardin Samuel, Anita Villani, Conrad V Fernandez, David Malkin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nardin SamuelDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Division of Hematology/Oncology and Genetics &Genome Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada.
Anita VillaniDepartment of Pediatrics and Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Division of Hematology/Oncology and Genetics &Genome Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada.
Conrad V FernandezDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, IWK Health Centre, 5850-5980 University Avenue, Halifax, NS B3K 6R8, Canada.
David Malkin1] Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Division of Hematology/Oncology and Genetics &Genome Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada. [2] Department of Pediatrics and Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Division of Hematology/Oncology and Genetics &Genome Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada.
Hospital for Sick Children · CAIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical management of familial cancer begins with recognition of patterns of cancer occurrence suggestive of genetic susceptibility in a proband or pedigree, to enable subsequent investigation of the underlying DNA mutations. In this regard, next-generation sequencing of DNA continues to transform cancer diagnostics, by enabling screening for cancer-susceptibility genes in the context of known and emerging familial cancer syndromes. Increasingly, not only are candidate cancer genes sequenced, but also entire 'healthy' genomes are mapped in children with cancer and their family members. Although large-scale genomic analysis is considered intrinsic to the success of cancer research and discovery, a number of accompanying ethical and technical issues must be addressed before this approach can be adopted widely in personalized therapy. In this Perspectives article, we describe our views on how the emergence of new sequencing technologies and cancer surveillance strategies is altering the framework for the clinical management of hereditary cancer. Genetic counselling and disclosure issues are discussed, and strategies for approaching ethical dilemmas are proposed.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementGenetic CounselingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansNeoplasmsRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID25311347
OpenAlexW2047080566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.