Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25311241›Full record

Observational studyAddiction (Abingdon, England)2015

Capturing illicit drug use where and when it happens: an ecological momentary assessment of the social, physical and activity environment of using versus craving illicit drugs.

Beth S Linas, Carl Latkin, Ryan P Westergaard, Larry W Chang, Robert C Bollinger, Andrew Genz, Gregory D Kirk

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Alcohol Craving and Consumption in Borderline Personality Disorder: When, Where, and with Whom.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Beth S LinasDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Carl Latkin
Ryan P Westergaard
Larry W Chang
Robert C Bollinger
Andrew Genz
Gregory D Kirk
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Vaccine Response and Immunotherapeutics SWGP30AI094189 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Richard E. Chaisson · 2012 to 2026
$67.0M
The AIDS Linked to the Intravenous Experience (ALIVE) StudyU01DA036297 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Gregory D Kirk, Shruti H Mehta · 2014 to 2026
$28.9M
INCIDENCE OF HIV INFECTIONS IN A COHORT OF IV DRUG USERSR01DA012568 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MEHTA, SHRUTI H · 1999 to 2017
$15.5M
NATURAL HISTORY OF HIV INFECTION IN INJECTION DRUG USERSR37DA004334 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KIRK, GREGORY D · 1997 to 2006
$9.0M
THE NATURAL HISTORY OF HIV INFECTION AMONG DRUG USERSR01DA004334 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KIRK, GREGORY D · 1987 to 2011
$7.6M
Johns Hopkins HIV Epidemiology and Prevention Sciences Training ProgramT32AI102623 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Shruti H Mehta · 2013 to 2026
$5.3M
Natural History of HIV Infection In Injection Drug UsersR56DA004334 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KIRK, GREGORY D · 2012 to 2013
$3.2M
Barriers to Effective HIV Care for Injection Drug Users After Release from PrisonK23DA032306 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI WESTERGAARD, RYAN PATRICK · 2012 to 2016
$975k
Peer health workers: Impact on retention, care and secondary prevention of PLHIVK23MH086338 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CHANG, LARRY WILLIAM · 2010 to 2014
$914k
Patient-Oriented Research and Mentorship in HIV and Non-Communicable DiseasesK24AI118591 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KIRK, GREGORY D · 2015 to 2019
$766k
NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI118591NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI094189NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI102623NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA032306NIDA NIH HHS K23DA032306NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA004334NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012568NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA-12568NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA036297NIDA NIH HHS U01-DA-04334NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH086338NIMH NIH HHS K23MH086338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo understand the environmental and contextual influences of illicit cocaine and heroin use and craving using mobile health (mHealth) methods.

designInteractive mHealth methods of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) were utilized in the Exposure Assessment in Current Time (EXACT) study to assess drug use and craving among urban drug users in real time. Participants were provided with mobile devices and asked to self-report every time they either craved (without using) or used heroin or cocaine for 30 days from November 2008 through May 2013.

settingBaltimore, MD, USA.

participantsA total of 109 participants from the AIDS Linked to the IntraVenous Experience (ALIVE) study. MEASUREMENTS: For each drug use or craving event, participants answered questions concerning their drug use, current mood and their social, physical and activity environments. Odds ratios (OR) of drug use versus craving were obtained from logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations of all reported events.

findingsParticipants were a median of 48.5 years old, 90% African American, 52% male and 59% HIV-infected. Participants were significantly more likely to report use rather than craving drugs if they were with someone who was using drugs [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.13, 1.86), in an abandoned space (aOR = 6.65, 95% CI = 1.78, 24.84) or walking/wandering (aOR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.11, 2.54). Craving drugs was associated with being with a child (aOR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.12, 0.59), eating (aOR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.34, 0.85) or being at the doctor's office (aOR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.12, 0.80).

conclusionsThere are distinct drug using and craving environments among urban drug users, which may provide a framework for developing real-time context-sensitive interventions.

Indexed as

CravingIllicit DrugsAdultAffectBaltimoreChoice BehaviorCocaine-Related DisordersFemaleHeroin DependenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocial EnvironmentSocioeconomic FactorsIllicit DrugsEcological Momentary AssessmentEXACT studyHIVillicit drug cravingillicit drug usemHealthmobile devicesurban drug users

Identifiers

PMID25311241
PMCPMC4447335
OpenAlexW1910384141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.