Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25310742›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2014

Efficacy and complications of polyethylene glycols for treatment of constipation in children: a meta-analysis.

Si-Le Chen, Shi-Rong Cai, Liang Deng, Xin-Hua Zhang, Te-Dong Luo, Jian-Jun Peng, Jian-Bo Xu, Wen-Feng Li, Chuang-Qi Chen, Jin-Ping Ma and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Functional constipation in pediatric patients: an observational study in southern Brazil.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2025
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Si-Le ChenDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou (S-LC, S-RC, LD, X-HZ, J-JP, J-BX, W-FL, C-QC, J-PM, Y-LH); and Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan (T-DL), Guangdong Province, China.
Shi-Rong Cai
Liang Deng
Xin-Hua Zhang
Te-Dong Luo
Jian-Jun Peng
Jian-Bo Xu
Wen-Feng Li
Chuang-Qi Chen
Jin-Ping Ma
Yu-Long He
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Constipation is a common childhood complaint. In 90% to 95% of children, constipation is functional, which means that there is no objective evidence of an underlying pathological condition. Polyethylene glycol (PEG or macrogol) solution is an osmotic laxative agent that is absorbed in only trace amounts from the gastrointestinal tract and routinely used to treat chronic constipation in adults. Here, we report the results of a meta-analysis of PEG-based laxatives compared with lactulose, milk of magnesia (magnesium hydroxide), oral liquid paraffin (mineral oil), or acacia fiber, psyllium fiber, and fructose in children. This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and involved searches of MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases up to February 10, 2014, using the keywords (Constipation OR Functional Constipation OR Fecal Impaction) AND (Children) AND (Polyethylene Glycol OR Laxative). Primary efficacy outcomes included a number of stool passages/wk and percentage of patients who reported satisfactory stool consistency. Secondary safety outcomes included diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea or vomiting, pain or straining at defecation, bloating or flatulence, hard stool consistency, poor palatability, and rectal bleeding. We identified 231 articles, 27 of which were suitable for full-text review and 10 of which were used in the meta-analysis. Patients who were treated with PEG experienced more successful disimpaction compared with those treated with non-PEG laxatives. Treatment-related adverse events were acceptable and generally well tolerated. PEG-based laxatives are effective and safe for chronic constipation and for resolving fecal impaction in children. Children's acceptance of PEG-based laxatives appears to be better than non-PEG laxatives. Optimal dosages, routes of administration, and PEG regimens should be determined in future randomized controlled studies and meta-analyses.

Indexed as

ChildChronic DiseaseConstipationHumansLaxativesModels, StatisticalPolyethylene GlycolsTreatment OutcomeLaxativesPolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID25310742
PMCPMC4616298
OpenAlexW1975219556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.