Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25310574›Full record

ArticleCurrent eye research2015

The Muscarinic Antagonist MT3 Distinguishes Between Form Deprivation- and Negative Lens-Induced Myopia in Chicks.

Debora L Nickla, Yekaterina Yusupova, Kristen Totonelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current eye research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Studies on retinal mechanisms possibly related to myopia inhibition by atropine in the chicken.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. AlphaClinical & experimental optometry · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effect of MT3 on Retinal and Choroidal TGF-Journal of ophthalmology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Debora L NicklaDepartment of Bioscience, The New England College of Optometry , Boston, MA , USA.
Yekaterina Yusupova
Kristen Totonelly
New England College of Optometry · US

Funding

Vision, eye growth rhythms and retinal signals in refractive developmentR01EY025307 · NEI · NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY · PI NICKLA, DEBORA L · 2016 to 2022
$3.6M
Ocular Diurnal Rhythms and Eye GrowthR01EY013636 · NEI · NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY · PI NICKLA, DEBORA L · 2002 to 2012
$1.8M
SHORT TERM RES TRAINING AT THE NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE OFT35EY007149 · NEI · NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY · PI Athanasios Panorgias · 1999 to 2026
$1.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013636NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025307NEI NIH HHS T35 EY007149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe muscarinic M4 receptor antagonist MT3 (muscarinic toxin 3) is effective at inhibiting the development of myopia in response to form deprivation, and prevents the deprivation-induced choroidal thinning. We asked if it was equally effective in eyes wearing negative lenses.

methodsChicks wore monocular diffusers or -15 D lenses for 7 days. Intravitreal injections of MT3 (90 nmoles) were given on days 2, 4 and 6 (diffusers: n = 13; lenses: n = 12); saline was used as injection controls (diffusers: n = 11; lenses: n = 13). Ocular dimensions were measured with A-scan ultrasound on days 1 and 7. Refractions were measured using a Hartinger's refractometer. A third group of "normal" chicks received monocular injections of drug (n = 7) or saline (n = 7), and eyes were measured 3 and 72 h later.

resultsMT3 inhibited the myopia in response to form deprivation, but did not affect the compensation to negative lenses (drug versus saline: FD: -3.2 versus -7.4 D; p < 0.001; Lenses: -4.5 versus -4.9 D). The myopia inhibition in deprived eyes was due to inhibition of axial growth (610 µm versus 827 µm; p < 0.005); lens-wearing eyes grew similar to saline controls (747 µm versus 743 µm). There was no effect of the drug on the choroidal thinning in either condition. Unexpectedly, MT3 produced choroidal thinning in normal eyes (drug versus saline: -45 versus 16 µm/3 h; p < 0.05), but had no effect on refractions or ocular growth.

conclusionsMT3 does not inhibit the development of myopia in response to hyperopic defocus. It also causes choroidal thinning, an anomalous effect for a muscarinic receptor antagonist. These results support the existence of different muscarinic mechanisms in the excessive eye growth resulting from the open-loop condition of form deprivation, versus that of hyperopic defocus, a closed-loop condition.

Indexed as

AnimalsChickensChoroidDisease Models, AnimalEyeglassesIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsIntravitreal InjectionsMuscarinic AntagonistsMyopiaNeurotoxinsPeptidesRefraction, OcularSensory DeprivationIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMuscarinic Antagonistsmuscarinic toxin 3NeurotoxinsPeptidesChickchoroidsform deprivationmuscarinicmyopia

Identifiers

PMID25310574
PMCPMC4801183
OpenAlexW2115075187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.