Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25310465›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Optimal chemotherapy for leukemia: a model-based strategy for individualized treatment.

Devaraj Jayachandran, Ann E Rundell, Robert E Hannemann, Terry A Vik, Doraiswami Ramkrishna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Treatment of evolving cancers will require dynamic decision support.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Computational design of treatment strategies for proactive therapy on atopic dermatitis using optimal control theory.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2017
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Devaraj JayachandranSchool of Chemical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Ann E RundellWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Robert E HannemannSchool of Chemical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America; Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Terry A VikRiley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America.
Doraiswami RamkrishnaSchool of Chemical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, commonly known as ALL, is a predominant form of cancer during childhood. With the advent of modern healthcare support, the 5-year survival rate has been impressive in the recent past. However, long-term ALL survivors embattle several treatment-related medical and socio-economic complications due to excessive and inordinate chemotherapy doses received during treatment. In this work, we present a model-based approach to personalize 6-Mercaptopurine (6-MP) treatment for childhood ALL with a provision for incorporating the pharmacogenomic variations among patients. Semi-mechanistic mathematical models were developed and validated for i) 6-MP metabolism, ii) red blood cell mean corpuscular volume (MCV) dynamics, a surrogate marker for treatment efficacy, and iii) leukopenia, a major side-effect. With the constraint of getting limited data from clinics, a global sensitivity analysis based model reduction technique was employed to reduce the parameter space arising from semi-mechanistic models. The reduced, sensitive parameters were used to individualize the average patient model to a specific patient so as to minimize the model uncertainty. Models fit the data well and mimic diverse behavior observed among patients with minimum parameters. The model was validated with real patient data obtained from literature and Riley Hospital for Children in Indianapolis. Patient models were used to optimize the dose for an individual patient through nonlinear model predictive control. The implementation of our approach in clinical practice is realizable with routinely measured complete blood counts (CBC) and a few additional metabolite measurements. The proposed approach promises to achieve model-based individualized treatment to a specific patient, as opposed to a standard-dose-for-all, and to prescribe an optimal dose for a desired outcome with minimum side-effects.

Indexed as

Patient-Specific ModelingPrecision MedicineAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticChildErythrocyte IndicesHumansLeukopeniaMercaptopurinePrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaSurvivorsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticMercaptopurine

Identifiers

PMID25310465
PMCPMC4195683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.