Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25310463›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Measurement of glycosylated alpha-fetoprotein improves diagnostic power over the native form in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hyunsoo Kim, Kyunggon Kim, Jonghwa Jin, Jiyoung Park, Su Jong Yu, Jung-Hwan Yoon, Youngsoo Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Marked elevation of serum alpha-fetoprotein followingLiver research (Beijing, China) · 2022
    Article
  5. Glycan Analysis as Biomarkers for Testicular Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. International journal of medical sciences · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hyunsoo KimDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyunggon KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jonghwa JinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jiyoung ParkDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Su Jong YuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jung-Hwan YoonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Youngsoo KimDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) has long been used as a diagnostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), albeit controversially. Although it remains widely used in clinics, the value of AFP in HCC diagnosis has recently been challenged due to its significant rates of false positive and false negative findings. To improve the efficacy of AFP as HCC diagnostic marker, we developed a method of measuring total and glycosylated AFP by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM)-MS. In this study, we verified the total amount of AFP (nonglycopeptide levels) and the degree of glycosylated AFP (deglycopeptide levels) in 60 normal (41 men and 19 women; mean age 53 years; range 32-74 years), 35 LC (23 men and 12 women; mean age 56 years; range 43-78 years; HBV-related), and 60 HCC subjects (42 men and 18 women; mean age 58 years; range 38-76 years; HBV-related; 30 stage I, 15 stage II, and 10 stage III). By MRM-MS analysis, the nonglycopeptide had 56.7% sensitivity, 68.3% specificity, and an AUC of 0.687 [cutoff value: ≥0.02 (light/heavy ratio)], comparing the normal and HCC group, whereas the deglycopeptide had 93.3% sensitivity, 68.3% specificity, and an AUC of 0.859 [cutoff value: ≥0.02 (light/heavy ratio)]. In comparing the stage I HCC subgroup with the LC group, the nonglycopeptide had a sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 80.0%, and an AUC of 0.712 [cutoff value: ≥0.02 (light/heavy ratio)], whereas the deglycopeptide had a sensitivity of 96.7%, specificity of 80.0%, and an AUC of 0.918 [cutoff value: ≥0.02 (light/heavy ratio)]. These data demonstrate that the discriminatory power of the deglycopeptide is greater than that of the nonglycopeptide. We conclude that deglycopeptide can distinguish cancer status between normal subjects and HCC patients better than nonglycopeptide.

Indexed as

AdultAgedalpha-FetoproteinsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, HepatocellularFemaleGlycopeptidesGlycosylationHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingROC CurveTumor Burdenalpha-FetoproteinsBiomarkers, TumorGlycopeptides

Identifiers

PMID25310463
PMCPMC4195728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.