ArticleThe Journal of investigative dermatology2015
Clonogenic cell subpopulations maintain congenital melanocytic nevi.
Article in The Journal of investigative dermatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pluripotency markers are differentially induced by IGF1 and bFGF in cells from patients' lesions of large/giant congenital melanocytic nevi.Biomarker research · 2019Article
- COLD-PCR Technologies in the Area of Personalized Medicine: Methodology and Applications.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2017Review
- Nevospheres from neurocutaneous melanocytosis cells show reduced viability when treated with specific inhibitors of NRAS signaling pathway.Neuro-oncology · 2016Article
- Genetics of melanocytic nevi.Pigment cell & melanoma research · 2015Review
- Cells to surgery quiz: March 2015.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large congenital melanocytic nevi (lCMN) are benign melanocytic tumors associated with an increased risk of melanoma transformation. They result predominantly from a post-zygotic somatic NRAS mutation. These lesions persist and even increase after birth proportionally to the child's growth. Therefore, we asked here whether cells with clonogenic and tumorigenic properties persisted postnatally in lCMN. Subpopulations of lCMN cells expressed stem cell/progenitor lineage markers such as Sox10, Nestin, Oct4, and ABCB5. In vitro, 1 in 250 cells from fresh lCMN formed colonies that could be passaged and harbored the same NRAS mutation as the original nevus. In vivo, lCMN specimens xenografted in immunocompromised mice expanded 4-fold. BrdU(+)-proliferating and label-retaining melanocytes were found within the outgrowth skin tissue of these xenografts, which displayed the same benign nested architecture as the original nevus. lCMN cell suspensions were not able to expand when xenografted alone in Rag 2-/- mice. Conversely, when mixed with keratinocytes, these cells reconstituted the architecture of the human nevus with its characteristic melanocyte layout, lentiginous hyperplasia, and nested architecture. Overall, our data demonstrate that, after birth, certain lCMN cell subtypes still display features such as clonogenic potential and expand into nevus-like structures when cooperating with adjacent keratinocytes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.