Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25310057›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse2015

A Pilot Study to Examine the Feasibility and Potential Effectiveness of Using Smartphones to Provide Recovery Support for Adolescents.

Michael L Dennis, Christy K Scott, Rodney R Funk, Lisa Nicholson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Refining Parent SMART: User feedback to optimize a multi-modal intervention.Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Digital interventions for substance use disorders in young people: rapid review.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael L Dennisa Chestnut Health Systems , Normal , Illinois , USA.
Christy K Scottb Chestnut Health Systems , Chicago , Illinois , USA.
Rodney R Funka Chestnut Health Systems , Normal , Illinois , USA.
Lisa Nicholsonb Chestnut Health Systems , Chicago , Illinois , USA.
Chestnut Health Systems · US

Funding

Early Re-Intervention Experiment2(ERI-2)R37DA011323 · NIDA · CHESTNUT HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. · PI DENNIS, MICHAEL L. · 2003 to 2012
$8.4M
Smartphone Addiction Recovery Coach for Young Adults (SARC-YA) ExperimentR01DA011323 · NIDA · CHESTNUT HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. · PI MICHAEL L. DENNIS, ASHLI J SHEIDOW · 1999 to 2026
$5.5M
Recovery Management Checkups for Women Offenders (RMC-WO) ExperimentR01DA021174 · NIDA · CHESTNUT HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. · PI SCOTT, CHRISTY K · 2007 to 2011
$4.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA011323NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA021174NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA011323NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA11323
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmartphone applications can potentially provide recovery monitoring and support in real-time, real-life contexts. Study aims included determining feasibility of (a) adolescents completing ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) and utilizing phone-based ecological momentary interventions (EMIs); and (b) using EMA and EMI data to predict substance use in the subsequent week.

methodsTwenty-nine adolescents were recruited at discharge from residential treatment, regardless of their discharge status or length of stay. During the 6-week pilot, youth were prompted to complete an EMA at 6 random times per day and were provided access to a suite of recovery support EMI. Youth completed 87% of the 5580 EMAs. Based on use in the next 7 days, EMA observations were classified into 3 risk groups: "Current Use" in the past 30 minutes (3% of observations), "Unrecognized Risk" (42%), or "Recognized Risk" (55%). All youth had observations in 2 or more risk groups and 38% in all 3. Youth accessed an EMI on average 162 times each week.

resultsParticipants were 31% female, 48% African American, 21% Caucasian, 7% Hispanic, and 24% Mixed/Other; average age was 16.6 years. During the 90 days prior to entering treatment, youth reported using alcohol (38%), marijuana (41%), and other drugs (7%). When compared with the "Recognized Risk" group's use in the following week (31%), both the "Unrecognized Risk" (50%, odds ratio [OR]=2.08) and "Current Use" (96%, OR=50.30) groups reported significantly higher rates of use in the next week. When an EMI was accessed 2 or more times within the hour following an EMA, the rate of using during the next week was significantly lower than when EMIs were not accessed (32% vs. 43%, OR=0.62).

conclusionsResults demonstrate the feasibility of using smartphones for recovery monitoring and support with adolescents, with potential to reduce use.

Indexed as

Ecological Momentary AssessmentMobile ApplicationsSmartphoneAdolescentFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsSubstance-Related DisordersTherapy, Computer-AssistedAdolescentmobile phonesrecovery managementsmartphonessubstance use disorders

Identifiers

PMID25310057
PMCPMC4395503
OpenAlexW1977444702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.