Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25310016›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Chikungunya viral fitness measures within the vector and subsequent transmission potential.

Rebecca C Christofferson, Daniel M Chisenhall, Helen J Wearing, Christopher N Mores

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Impact of Irradiation on Vector Competence ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Increased temperatures reduce the vectorial capacity ofEmerging microbes & infections · 2020
    Article
  13. Chikungunya Virus Transmission at Low Temperature byPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca C ChristoffersonDepartment of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America.
Daniel M ChisenhallDepartment of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America.
Helen J WearingDepartment of Biology, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America; Department of Mathematics & Statistics, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America.
Christopher N MoresDepartment of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America.

Funding

Predicting vector-borne virus transmission dynamics and emergence potentialU01GM097661 · NIGMS · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV A&M COL BATON ROUGE · PI MORES, CHRISTOPHER · 2011 to 2015
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM097661NIGMS NIH HHS U01GM097661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the recent emergence of chikungunya in the Americas, the accuracy of forecasting and prediction of chikungunya transmission potential in the U.S. requires urgent assessment. The La Reunion-associated sub-lineage of chikungunya (with a valine substitution in the envelope protein) was shown to increase viral fitness in the secondary vector, Ae. albopictus. Subsequently, a majority of experimental and modeling efforts focused on this combination of a sub-lineage of the East-Central-South African genotype (ECSA-V)-Ae. albopictus, despite the Asian genotype being the etiologic agent of recent chikungunya outbreaks world-wide. We explore a collection of data to investigate relative transmission efficiencies of the three major genotypes/sub-lineages of chikungunya and found difference in the extrinsic incubation periods to be largely overstated. However, there is strong evidence supporting the role of Ae. albopictus in the expansion of chikungunya that our R0 calculations cannot attribute to fitness increases in one vector over another. This suggests other ecological factors associated with the Ae. albopictus-ECSA-V cycle may drive transmission intensity differences. With the apparent bias in literature, however, we are less prepared to evaluate transmission where Ae. aegypti plays a significant role. Holistic investigations of CHIKV transmission cycle(s) will allow for more complete assessment of transmission risk in areas affected by either or both competent vectors.

Indexed as

Disease VectorsGenetic FitnessAlgorithmsAnimalsChikungunya FeverChikungunya virusCulicidaeHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicModels, TheoreticalPublication Bias

Identifiers

PMID25310016
PMCPMC4195746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.