Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25309847›Full record

ArticleHealth & justice2013

A cluster randomized trial of an organizational linkage intervention for offenders with substance use disorders: study protocol.

Peter D Friedmann, Lori J Ducharme, Wayne Welsh, Linda Frisman, Kevin Knight, Timothy Kinlock, Shannon Gwin Mitchell, Elizabeth Hall, Terry Urbine, Michael Gordon and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & justice, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter D Friedmann
Lori J Ducharme
Wayne Welsh
Linda Frisman
Kevin Knight
Timothy Kinlock
Shannon Gwin Mitchell
Elizabeth Hall
Terry Urbine
Michael Gordon
Sami Abdel-Salam
Dan O'Connell
Carmen Albizu-Garcia
Hannah Knudsen
Jamieson Duval
Juliane Fenster
Jennifer Pankow for the CJ-DATS MATICCE Workgroup
Providence College · US

Funding

Implementing Effective HIV/Drug Treatment in Corrections-MidStates CJ-DATS CenterU01DA016230 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI VISHER, CHRISTINE A · 2002 to 2013
$7.5M
NDRI Rocky Mountain Research Center for CJDATS 2U01DA016200 · NIDA · NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT &RES INSTITUTES · PI SACKS, STANLEY · 2002 to 2013
$7.2M
Implementing and Sustaining Innovations in Criminal Justice-DATS 2 (TCU RC)U01DA016190 · NIDA · TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY · PI KNIGHT, KEVIN · 2002 to 2012
$6.9M
Continuum of Care for Drug-Involved OffendersU01DA016191 · NIDA · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL (PROVIDENCE, RI) · PI FRIEDMANN, PETER D, STEIN, LYNDA A · 2002 to 2013
$6.7M
The Pacific Coast Research Center of the NIDA CJ-DATSU01DA016211 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI PRENDERGAST, MICHAEL LAURENT · 2002 to 2013
$6.4M
CT Research Center for Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Study CenterU01DA016194 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI FRISMAN, LINDA K · 2002 to 2012
$6.4M
Central States Criminal Justice Drug Abuse CenterU01DA016205 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI LEUKEFELD, CARL G · 2002 to 2012
$6.1M
The Pennsylvania Research Center at Temple UniversityU01DA025284 · NIDA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI BELENKO, STEVEN R · 2009 to 2013
$2.8M
The Arizona Network for the Study of Implementation EffectivenessU01DA025307 · NIDA · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI SHAFER, MICHAEL S · 2008 to 2012
$2.8M
Implementing Treatment Initiatives for Criminal Justice ClientsU01DA025233 · NIDA · FRIENDS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. · PI KINLOCK, TIMOTHY W · 2009 to 2010
$977k
NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA016190NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA016191NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA016194NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA016200NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA016205NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA016211NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA016230NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA025233NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA025284NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA025307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubstance use disorders are highly prevalent in community correctional populations, yet these settings frequently are ill-equipped to identify and refer offenders to community-based treatment services. In particular, community corrections staff are often opposed to the use of medication in addiction treatment because of inadequate knowledge, resources, and organizational structures to facilitate client linkages to evidence-based services. METHODS/

designEach of the NIDA-funded Research Centers recruited 2 criminal justice agencies to participate in the study. Eligibility rules required study sites that were focused on community corrections (i.e., probation or parole), had few or no formal relationships with treatment providers for referring clients to medication-assisted treatment, and had no state or local policies prohibiting such relationships. Sites under the oversight of the same parent agency were eligible only if they were in geographically distinct catchment areas, and could be assigned to different study arms without cross-contamination at any level. The 18 clusters consisted of community corrections officers and their offender caseloads nested within agencies, each of which was partnered with at least one community-based substance abuse treatment program. Randomization was blocked by Research Center, within which one cluster was randomly assigned to a training-only condition (comparison) and the other to training followed by a strategic organizational linkage process (intervention). Line staff received a scientifically-grounded, systematically-delivered training session that addresses gaps in existing knowledge, perceptions, and information about medication-assisted treatment (MAT) and local availability of MAT services. Key decision-makers subsequently were asked to collaborate in a strategic planning process to enhance formal and informal linkages between criminal justice agencies and local MAT providers. It was hypothesized that the two implementation intervention components together would be more likely than staff training alone to improve the process of referring opioid- and alcohol-dependent adults under community supervision to appropriate addiction pharmacotherapy. Outcomes were measured at the client (referrals), line staff (attitudes), and organizational (linkage) levels. DISCUSSION: Through closer collaboration among criminal justice agencies and treatment providers, improved linkages to effective substance abuse treatment should yield significant clinical, public health and public safety benefits.

Indexed as

Criminal justiceDrug abuseOrganizational changeTreatment services

Identifiers

PMID25309847
PMCPMC4193542
OpenAlexW2132036468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.