Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25309814›Full record

ArticleJournal of blood disorders & transfusion2013

Cryopreservation and Enumeration of Human Endothelial Progenitor and Endothelial Cells for Clinical Trials.

T Bogoslovsky, D Wang, D Maric, L Scattergood-Keepper, M Spatz, S Auh, J Hallenbeck

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of blood disorders & transfusion, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Endothelial Progenitor Cells: A Brief Update.International journal of stem cells · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cell sources for in vitro human liver cell culture models.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T BogoslovskyCenter for Neuroscience & Regenerative Medicine, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, USA ; National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
D WangNational Institute of Nursing Research, Bethesda, USA.
D MaricNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Flow Cytometry Core Facility, Bethesda, USA.
L Scattergood-KeepperNational Institute of Nursing Research, Bethesda, USA.
M SpatzStroke Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, USA.
S AuhNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
J HallenbeckStroke Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, USA.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · US

Funding

Protective Mechanisms In Cerebral IschemiaZIANS002924 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI HALLENBECK, JOHN · 2009 to 2018
$16.5M
PROTECTIVE MECHANISMS IN CEREBRAL ISCHEMIAZ01NS002924 · NINDS · NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI HALLENBECK, JOHN M · 1996 to 2008
$3.6M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 NS002924Intramural NIH HHS ZIA NS002924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndothelial progenitor cells (EPC) are markers of endothelial injury and may serve as a surrogate marker for vascular repair in interventional clinical trials. Objectives of this study were to modify a method of isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and enumeration of EPC and mature endothelial cells (EC) from peripheral blood and to evaluate influence of cryopreservation on viability of PBMC and on numbers of EPC and EC. PATIENTS/

methodsEPC and EC were analyzed in healthy volunteers in freshly isolated PBMC collected in CPT (cell preparation tubes) and in PBMC cryopreserved with: 1) Gibco Recovery

resultsCryopreservation for 7 days at -80°C decreased viable PBMC from 94 ± 0.5% (fresh) to 84 ± 4% (the custom medium) and to 69 ± 8% (Gibco medium), while cryopreservation at -65°C decreased viability to 60 ± 6% (p<0.001, the custom medium) and 49 ± 5% (p<0.001, Gibco medium). In fresh samples early EPC (CD45

conclusionsOur data indicate that cryopreservation at -80°C for 7 days decreases, although not significantly, viability of PBMC and numbers of subsets of EC and EPC. This method may provide an optimized approach to isolation and short-term cryopreservation of subsets of EPC and of mature EC suitable for multicenter trials.

Indexed as

AngiogenesisCryopreservationEndothelial cellsEndothelial progenitor cellsFlow cytometry

Identifiers

PMID25309814
PMCPMC4193669
OpenAlexW2150730164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.