ArticleFrontiers in plant science2014
Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of yam (Dioscorea rotundata): an important tool for functional study of genes and crop improvement.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.
- Whole-genome sequencing reveals a possible molecular basis of sex determination in the dioecious wild yam Dioscorea tokoro.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- A robust in-vitro and ex-vitro Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated hairy root transformation system in mungbean for efficient visual screening of transformants using the RUBY reporter.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- An HD-ZIP I Transcription Factor DZHDZ32 Upregulates Diosgenin Biosynthesis inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- The role of nanoparticles in transforming plant genetic engineering: advancements, challenges and future prospects.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Review
- Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation for the Development of Transgenic Crops; Present and Future Prospects.Molecular biotechnology · 2024Review
- Genetic engineering and genome editing technologies as catalyst for Africa's food security: the case of plant biotechnology in Nigeria.Frontiers in genome editing · 2024Review
- CRISPR/Cas9: an advanced platform for root and tuber crops improvement.Frontiers in genome editing · 2023Review
- Optimization ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Ectopic expression ofBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- Development of chloroplast transformation and gene expression regulation technology in land plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Application of cell culture technology and genetic engineering for production of future foods and crop improvement to strengthen food security.Bioengineered · 2021Review
- Strategies to combat the problem of yam anthracnose disease: Status and prospects.Molecular plant pathology · 2021Review
- A CRISPR/Cas9-based genome-editing system for yam (Dioscorea spp.).Plant biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- Clay nanosheet-mediated delivery of recombinant plasmids expressing artificial miRNAs via leaf spray to prevent infection by plant DNA viruses.Horticulture research · 2020Article
- Review
- TheFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- A simple and fastPlant methods · 2020Article
- Tissue culture and next-generation sequencing: A combined approach for detecting yam (Physiological and molecular plant pathology · 2019Article
- Identification of candidate flowering and sex genes in white Guinea yam (D. rotundata Poir.) by SuperSAGE transcriptome profiling.PloS one · 2019Article
- Nanoparticle-Mediated Delivery towards Advancing Plant Genetic Engineering.Trends in biotechnology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although genetic transformation of clonally propagated crops has been widely studied as a tool for crop improvement and as a vital part of the development of functional genomics resources, there has been no report of any existing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of yam (Dioscorea spp.) with evidence of stable integration of T-DNA. Yam is an important crop in the tropics and subtropics providing food security and income to over 300 million people. However, yam production remains constrained by increasing levels of field and storage pests and diseases. A major constraint to the development of biotechnological approaches for yam improvement has been the lack of an efficient and robust transformation and regeneration system. In this study, we developed an Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Dioscorea rotundata using axillary buds as explants. Two cultivars of D. rotundata were transformed using Agrobacterium tumefaciens harboring the binary vectors containing selectable marker and reporter genes. After selection with appropriate concentrations of antibiotic, shoots were developed on shoot induction and elongation medium. The elongated antibiotic-resistant shoots were subsequently rooted on medium supplemented with selection agent. Successful transformation was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction, Southern blot analysis, and reporter genes assay. Expression of gusA gene in transgenic plants was also verified by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis. Transformation efficiency varied from 9.4 to 18.2% depending on the cultivars, selectable marker genes, and the Agrobacterium strain used for transformation. It took 3-4 months from Agro-infection to regeneration of complete transgenic plant. Here we report an efficient, fast and reproducible protocol for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of D. rotundata using axillary buds as explants, which provides a useful platform for future genetic engineering studies in this economically important crop.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.