Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25309520›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2014

Trends and future challenges in sampling the deep terrestrial biosphere.

Michael J Wilkins, Rebecca A Daly, Paula J Mouser, Ryan Trexler, Shihka Sharma, David R Cole, Kelly C Wrighton, Jennifer F Biddle, Elizabeth H Denis, Jim K Fredrickson and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Patterns ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  9. Viable cyanobacteria in the deep continental subsurface.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Michael J WilkinsSchool of Earth Sciences, The Ohio State University Columbus, OH, USA ; Department of Microbiology, The Ohio State University Columbus, OH, USA.
Rebecca A DalyDepartment of Microbiology, The Ohio State University Columbus, OH, USA.
Paula J MouserDepartment of Engineering, The Ohio State University Columbus, OH, USA.
Ryan TrexlerDepartment of Engineering, The Ohio State University Columbus, OH, USA.
Shihka SharmaDepartment of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University Morgantown, WV, USA.
David R ColeSchool of Earth Sciences, The Ohio State University Columbus, OH, USA.
Kelly C WrightonDepartment of Microbiology, The Ohio State University Columbus, OH, USA.
Jennifer F BiddleCollege of Earth, Ocean, and Environment, University of Delaware Lewes, DE, USA.
Elizabeth H DenisDepartment of Geosciences, Penn State University, State College PA, USA.
Jim K FredricksonBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, WA, USA.
Thomas L KieftDepartment of Biology, New Mexico Tech Socorro, NM, USA.
Tullis C OnstottDepartment of Geosciences, Princeton University Princeton, NJ, USA.
Lee PetersonItasca Consulting Group Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Susan M PfiffnerCenter for Environmental Biotechnology, University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN, USA.
Tommy J PhelpsCenter for Environmental Biotechnology, University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN, USA.
Matthew O SchrenkDepartment of Geological Sciences, Michigan State University East Lansing, MI, USA.
The Ohio State University · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · USItasca Consultants (United States) · USMichigan State University · USNew Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology · USPacific Northwest National Laboratory · USPennsylvania State University · USPrinceton University · USUniversity of Delaware · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research in the deep terrestrial biosphere is driven by interest in novel biodiversity and metabolisms, biogeochemical cycling, and the impact of human activities on this ecosystem. As this interest continues to grow, it is important to ensure that when subsurface investigations are proposed, materials recovered from the subsurface are sampled and preserved in an appropriate manner to limit contamination and ensure preservation of accurate microbial, geochemical, and mineralogical signatures. On February 20th, 2014, a workshop on "Trends and Future Challenges in Sampling The Deep Subsurface" was coordinated in Columbus, Ohio by The Ohio State University and West Virginia University faculty, and sponsored by The Ohio State University and the Sloan Foundation's Deep Carbon Observatory. The workshop aims were to identify and develop best practices for the collection, preservation, and analysis of terrestrial deep rock samples. This document summarizes the information shared during this workshop.

Indexed as

contaminationdeep biospheredeep lifedeep subsurfacedrillingshale

Identifiers

PMID25309520
PMCPMC4162470
OpenAlexW2014879763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.