Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25309478›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2014

The In-Out dispositional affective style questionnaire (IN-OUT DASQ): an exploratory factorial analysis.

Viridiana Mazzola, Giuseppe Marano, Elia M Biganzoli, Patrizia Boracchi, Tiziana Lanciano, Giampiero Arciero, Guido Bondolfi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Viridiana MazzolaSwiss Center for Affective Sciences - University of Geneva Geneva, Switzerland.
Giuseppe MaranoDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Healt, University of Milan Milan, Italy.
Elia M BiganzoliDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Healt, University of Milan Milan, Italy ; Unit of Medical Statistics and Biometry, Fondazione Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Milan, Italy.
Patrizia BoracchiDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Healt, University of Milan Milan, Italy.
Tiziana LancianoInstitute of Post-Rationalist Psychology Rome, Italy ; Department of Education, Psychology, Communication Science, University of Bari Bari, Italy.
Giampiero ArcieroInstitute of Post-Rationalist Psychology Rome, Italy ; Department of Psychiatry, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève Geneva, Switzerland.
Guido BondolfiDepartment of Psychiatry, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The issue of individual differences has always been an important area of research in psychology and, more recently, neuroimaging. A major source of interindividual variability stems from differences in basic affective dispositions. In order to make a contribution to this field of research, we have developed a new type of assessment - the In-Out dispositional affective style questionnaire (IN-OUT DASQ) - to measure the proneness between two different ways of feeling situated: a predominantly body-bound one in the case of the inward tendency and an externally anchored one in the case of the outward tendency (Arciero and Bondolfi, 2009). The IN-OUT DASQ contains two scales of seven items each, Self-centric engagement (SCE) and Other-centric engagement (OCE), as a disposition index for inwardness and outwardness respectively. The exploratory factor analysis in sample 1 (n = 292) confirmed a two-factor solution. Confirmatory factor analysis in sample 2 (n = 300) showed the good fit of this two-factor model. Next, we examined construct validity also investigating the correlations between the IN-OUT DASQ, the Big Five Questionnaire and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule in sample 3 (n = 153). The SCE and OCE scales had robust internal consistency and reliability, though the capacity to discriminate higher inward and outward participants was stronger in SCE. Although further validation research is required, the present study suggests the IN-OUT DASQ has the potential to be a measurement tool for detecting individual differences in social behavior and social affective neuroscience.

Indexed as

affective dispositionsinwardnessoutwardnesssocial affective neurosciencesocial behavior

Identifiers

PMID25309478
PMCPMC4161060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.