ArticleFrontiers in psychology2014
Number-induced shifts in spatial attention: a replication study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bow Your Head in Shame, or, Hold Your Head Up with Pride: Semantic Processing of Self-Esteem Concepts Orients Attention Vertically.PloS one · 2015Trial
- Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2022Article
- Perceiving numerosity does not cause automatic shifts of spatial attention.Experimental brain research · 2021Article
- Does Number Perception Cause Automatic Shifts of Spatial Attention? A Study of the Att-SNARC Effect in Numbers and Chinese Months.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- The Attentional-SNARC effect 16 years later: no automatic space-number association (taking into account finger counting style, imagery vividness, and learning style in 174 participants).Experimental brain research · 2019Article
- Spatial grounding of symbolic arithmetic: an investigation with optokinetic stimulation.Psychological research · 2019Article
- Attention allows the SNARC effect to operate on multiple number lines.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- On the genesis of spatial-numerical associations: Evolutionary and cultural factors co-construct the mental number line.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2018Review
- Numerical value biases sound localization.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Bidirectional Modulation of Numerical Magnitude.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2016Article
- How Does Working Memory Enable Number-Induced Spatial Biases?Frontiers in psychology · 2016Article
- Spatial coding of object typical size: evidence for a SNARC-like effect.Psychological research · 2015Article
- Spatial biases during mental arithmetic: evidence from eye movements on a blank screen.Frontiers in psychology · 2015Article
- Attentional cueing in numerical cognition.Frontiers in psychology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In a spatial attention paradigm, Fischer et al. (2003) showed that merely perceiving a number shifted attention according to the magnitude of the number. Low numbers shifted attention to the left and high numbers shifted attention to the right. This suggests that numbers are represented by the mental number line - a spatial image schema that is ordered from left to right with increasing magnitude. In six experiments, we used the spatial attention paradigm of Fischer et al. (2003) to investigate if and when such mental representations are activated. Participants detected visual targets that were preceded by low and high numbers. Between experiments we manipulated how participants processed the number. Participants either merely perceived the number, as in the experiments by Fischer et al. (2003) processed the number's parity, or processed the number's magnitude. Our results provide little support for the idea that numbers shift spatial attention. Only in one of the two experiments in which participants processed number magnitude did participants respond faster to targets in congruent locations (left for low magnitudes and right for high magnitudes) than in incongruent locations. In the other five experiments number magnitude did not affect spatial attention. This shows, in contrast to Fischer et al.'s (2003) results, that the mental number line is not activated automatically but at best only when it is contextually relevant. Furthermore, these results suggest that image schemas in general may be context-dependent rather than fundamental to mental concepts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.