Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25309452›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2014

Muscle acellular scaffold as a biomaterial: effects on C2C12 cell differentiation and interaction with the murine host environment.

Barbara Perniconi, Dario Coletti, Paola Aulino, Alessandra Costa, Paola Aprile, Luigi Santacroce, Ernesto Chiaravalloti, Laura Coquelin, Nathalie Chevallier, Laura Teodori and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Clinical Impact of "Real World Data" and Blockchain on Public Health: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Decellularized Hydrogels in Bone Tissue Engineering: A Topical Review.International journal of medical sciences · 2018
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution.

Barbara PerniconiDepartment of Biological Adaptation and Aging (B2A) UMR 8256 CNRS - ERL U1164 INSERM, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC University Paris 06 Paris, France ; Maxillofacial Unit, Calabrodental Clinic Crotone, Italy.
Dario ColettiDepartment of Biological Adaptation and Aging (B2A) UMR 8256 CNRS - ERL U1164 INSERM, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC University Paris 06 Paris, France ; AHFOS Department - Section of Histology and Medical Embryology, Sapienza University of Rome Rome, Italy ; Interuniversitary Institute of Miology (IIM) Rome, Italy.
Paola AulinoMaxillofacial Unit, Calabrodental Clinic Crotone, Italy ; AHFOS Department - Section of Histology and Medical Embryology, Sapienza University of Rome Rome, Italy ; Interuniversitary Institute of Miology (IIM) Rome, Italy.
Alessandra CostaAHFOS Department - Section of Histology and Medical Embryology, Sapienza University of Rome Rome, Italy ; Interuniversitary Institute of Miology (IIM) Rome, Italy ; UTAPRAD-DIM, ENEA Frascati, Italy.
Paola AprileUTAPRAD-DIM, ENEA Frascati, Italy ; Tor Vergata University of Rome Rome, Italy.
Luigi SantacroceJSGEM Department - Section of Taranto, University of Bari Taranto, Italy.
Ernesto ChiaravallotiMaxillofacial Unit, Calabrodental Clinic Crotone, Italy.
Laura CoquelinUnite d'Ingénierie et de Therapie Cellulaire, Etablissement Français du Sang Ile de France, Université Paris-Est Créteil Créteil, France.
Nathalie ChevallierUnite d'Ingénierie et de Therapie Cellulaire, Etablissement Français du Sang Ile de France, Université Paris-Est Créteil Créteil, France.
Laura TeodoriUTAPRAD-DIM, ENEA Frascati, Italy.
Sergio AdamoAHFOS Department - Section of Histology and Medical Embryology, Sapienza University of Rome Rome, Italy ; Interuniversitary Institute of Miology (IIM) Rome, Italy.
Massimo MarrelliMaxillofacial Unit, Calabrodental Clinic Crotone, Italy ; Regenerative Medicine Section, Tecnologica Research Institute Crotone, Italy.
Marco TatulloMaxillofacial Unit, Calabrodental Clinic Crotone, Italy ; Regenerative Medicine Section, Tecnologica Research Institute Crotone, Italy.
Adaptation Biologique et Vieillissement

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extracellular matrix (ECM) of decellularized organs possesses the characteristics of the ideal tissue-engineering scaffold (i.e., histocompatibility, porosity, degradability, non-toxicity). We previously observed that the muscle acellular scaffold (MAS) is a pro-myogenic environment in vivo. In order to determine whether MAS, which is basically muscle ECM, behaves as a myogenic environment, regardless of its location, we analyzed MAS interaction with both muscle and non-muscle cells and tissues, to assess the effects of MAS on cell differentiation. Bone morphogenetic protein treatment of C2C12 cells cultured within MAS induced osteogenic differentiation in vitro, thus suggesting that MAS does not irreversibly commit cells to myogenesis. In vivo MAS supported formation of nascent muscle fibers when replacing a muscle (orthotopic position). However, heterotopically grafted MAS did not give rise to muscle fibers when transplanted within the renal capsule. Also, no muscle formation was observed when MAS was transplanted under the xiphoid process, in spite of the abundant presence of cells migrating along the laminin-based MAS structure. Taken together, our results suggest that MAS itself is not sufficient to induce myogenic differentiation. It is likely that the pro-myogenic environment of MAS is not strictly related to the intrinsic properties of the muscle scaffold (e.g., specific muscle ECM proteins). Indeed, it is more likely that myogenic stem cells colonizing MAS recognize a muscle environment that ultimately allows terminal myogenic differentiation. In conclusion, MAS may represent a suitable environment for muscle and non-muscle 3D constructs characterized by a highly organized structure whose relative stability promotes integration with the surrounding tissues. Our work highlights the plasticity of MAS, suggesting that it may be possible to consider MAS for a wider range of tissue engineering applications than the mere replacement of volumetric muscle loss.

Indexed as

extracellular matrixmyogenic differentiationnicheosteogenic differentiationregenerative medicinetissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID25309452
PMCPMC4176465
OpenAlexW2148771379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.