Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25309443›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2014

Role of mineralization inhibitors in the regulation of hard tissue biomineralization: relevance to initial enamel formation and maturation.

Henry C Margolis, Seo-Young Kwak, Hajime Yamazaki

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Molecular Tools for Non-invasive Sexing of Wildlife.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Paleo-evo-devo implications of a revised conceptualization of enameloids and enamels.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Ameloblastin and its multifunctionality in amelogenesis: A review.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Henry C MargolisDepartment of Applied Oral Sciences, Center for Biomineralization, The Forsyth Institute Cambridge, MA, USA ; Department of Developmental Biology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine Boston, MA, USA.
Seo-Young KwakDepartment of Applied Oral Sciences, Center for Biomineralization, The Forsyth Institute Cambridge, MA, USA ; Department of Developmental Biology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine Boston, MA, USA.
Hajime YamazakiDepartment of Applied Oral Sciences, Center for Biomineralization, The Forsyth Institute Cambridge, MA, USA ; Department of Developmental Biology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine Boston, MA, USA.
Center for Systems Biology · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Structural determinants of amelogenin function in regulating enamel formationR01DE023091 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MARGOLIS, HENRY C · 2013 to 2017
$3.0M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE023091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebrate mineralized tissues, i.e., enamel, dentin, cementum, and bone, have unique hierarchical structures and chemical compositions. Although these tissues are similarly comprised of a crystalline calcium apatite mineral phase and a protein component, they differ with respect to crystal size and shape, level and distribution of trace mineral ions, the nature of the proteins present, and their relative proportions of mineral and protein components. Despite apparent differences, mineralized tissues are similarly derived by highly concerted extracellular processes involving matrix proteins, proteases, and mineral ion fluxes that collectively regulate the nucleation, growth and organization of forming mineral crystals. Nature, however, provides multiple ways to control the onset, rate, location, and organization of mineral deposits in developing mineralized tissues. Although our knowledge is quite limited in some of these areas, recent evidence suggests that hard tissue formation is, in part, controlled through the regulation of specific molecules that inhibit the mineralization process. This paper addresses the role of mineralization inhibitors in the regulation of biological mineralization with emphasis on the relevance of current findings to the process of amelogenesis. Mineralization inhibitors can also serve to maintain driving forces for calcium phosphate precipitation and prevent unwanted mineralization. Recent evidence shows that native phosphorylated amelogenins have the capacity to prevent mineralization through the stabilization of an amorphous calcium phosphate precursor phase, as observed in vitro and in developing teeth. Based on present findings, the authors propose that the transformation of initially formed amorphous mineral deposits to enamel crystals is an active process associated with the enzymatic processing of amelogenins. Such processing may serve to control both initial enamel crystal formation and subsequent maturation.

Indexed as

amorphous calcium phosphatebiomineralizationdental enamelinhibitorsmineral phase transformation

Identifiers

PMID25309443
PMCPMC4159985
OpenAlexW1970524458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.