Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25309387›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2014

The human hippocampus beyond the cognitive map: evidence from a densely amnesic patient.

Pamela A Banta Lavenex, Françoise Colombo, Farfalla Ribordy Lambert, Pierre Lavenex

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Construction and disruption of spatial memory networks during development.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Causes and consequences of limitations in visual working memory.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2016
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pamela A Banta LavenexLaboratory for Experimental Research on Behavior, Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland.
Françoise ColomboUnit of Neuropsychology and Aphasiology, Cantonal Hospital of Fribourg Fribourg, Switzerland.
Farfalla Ribordy LambertLaboratory of Brain and Cognitive Development, Department of Medicine and Fribourg Center for Cognition, University of Fribourg Fribourg, Switzerland.
Pierre LavenexLaboratory for Experimental Research on Behavior, Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland ; Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Development, Department of Medicine and Fribourg Center for Cognition, University of Fribourg Fribourg, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We tested a densely amnesic patient (P9), with bilateral hippocampal damage resulting from an autoimmune disorder, and 12 age- and sex-matched controls on a series of memory tasks designed to characterize allocentric spatial learning and memory abilities. We compared P9's ability to perform spatial memory tasks with her ability to perform non-spatial, color memory tasks. First, P9's performance was impaired as compared to controls even in the simplest versions of an allocentric spatial memory task, in which she had to find repeatedly over 10 trials the same location(s) of one, two or three illuminating foot pad(s) among 23 pads distributed in an open-field arena. In contrast, she performed as well as controls when she had to find repeatedly over 10 trials the same one, two or three pad(s) marked by color cue(s), whose locations varied between trials. Second, P9's performance was severely impaired in working memory tasks, when she had to learn on a trial-unique basis and remember the location(s) or the color(s) of one, two or three pad(s), while performing an interfering task during the 1-min interval separating encoding and retrieval. Without interference during the retention interval of the trial-unique tasks, P9's performance was partially preserved in the color tasks, whereas it remained severely impaired in the allocentric spatial tasks. Detailed behavioral analyses indicate that P9's memory representations are more limited than those of controls both in their precision (metric coding) and in the number of items that can be maintained in memory (capacity). These findings are consistent with the theory that the hippocampus contributes to the integration or binding of multiple items, in order to produce high-resolution/high-capacity representations of spatial and non-spatial information in the service of short-term/working and long-term memory.

Indexed as

amnesiadeclarative memoryinterferencemedial temporal lobememory capacityparahippocampalspatial memory

Identifiers

PMID25309387
PMCPMC4164002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.