Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25309336›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neural circuits2014

Input clustering and the microscale structure of local circuits.

William M DeBello, Thomas J McBride, Grant S Nichols, Katy E Pannoni, Daniel Sanculi, Douglas J Totten

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Perigenual and Subgenual Anterior Cingulate Afferents Converge on Common Pyramidal Cells in Amygdala Subregions of the Macaque.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Fear extinction reverses dendritic spine formation induced by fear conditioning in the mouse auditory cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Schaffer Collateral Inputs to CA1 Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons Follow Different Connectivity Rules.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

William M DeBelloCenter for Neuroscience, Department of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California-Davis Davis, CA, USA.
Thomas J McBrideCenter for Neuroscience, Department of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California-Davis Davis, CA, USA ; PLOS Medicine San Francisco, CA, USA.
Grant S NicholsCenter for Neuroscience, Department of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California-Davis Davis, CA, USA.
Katy E PannoniCenter for Neuroscience, Department of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California-Davis Davis, CA, USA.
Daniel SanculiCenter for Neuroscience, Department of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California-Davis Davis, CA, USA.
Douglas J TottenCenter for Neuroscience, Department of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California-Davis Davis, CA, USA.

Funding

The synaptic basis of learning in the auditory systemR01DC005640 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI DEBELLO, WILIAM MCINTYRE · 2002 to 2014
$3.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005640NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC05640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent development of powerful tools for high-throughput mapping of synaptic networks promises major advances in understanding brain function. One open question is how circuits integrate and store information. Competing models based on random vs. structured connectivity make distinct predictions regarding the dendritic addressing of synaptic inputs. In this article we review recent experimental tests of one of these models, the input clustering hypothesis. Across circuits, brain regions and species, there is growing evidence of a link between synaptic co-activation and dendritic location, although this finding is not universal. The functional implications of input clustering and future challenges are discussed.

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisAnimalsCerebral CortexModels, NeurologicalNerve NetNeuronsclustered plasticityconnectomedendritic integrationsynapse clusteringsynaptic clustering

Identifiers

PMID25309336
PMCPMC4162353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.