Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25309101›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2014

Limitations of anti-scatter grids when used with high resolution image detectors.

V Singh, A Jain, D R Bednarek, S Rudin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Scatter reduction for high resolution image detectors with a region of interest attenuator.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2014
    Article
  6. Anti-scatter grid artifact elimination for high resolution x-ray imaging CMOS detectors.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

V SinghToshiba Stoke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo (SUNY), Clinical Translational Research Center, 8 floor, 875 Ellicott Street, Buffalo, NY 14203.
A JainToshiba Stoke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo (SUNY), Clinical Translational Research Center, 8 floor, 875 Ellicott Street, Buffalo, NY 14203.
D R BednarekToshiba Stoke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo (SUNY), Clinical Translational Research Center, 8 floor, 875 Ellicott Street, Buffalo, NY 14203.
S RudinToshiba Stoke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo (SUNY), Clinical Translational Research Center, 8 floor, 875 Ellicott Street, Buffalo, NY 14203.

Funding

Micro-Radiographic Imager for Neuroovascular InterventionsR01EB002873 · NIBIB · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI RUDIN, STEPHEN · 2003 to 2015
$5.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB002873
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anti-scatter grids are used in fluoroscopic systems to improve image quality by absorbing scattered radiation. A stationary Smit Rontgen X-ray grid (line density: 70 lines/cm, grid ratio: 13:1) was used with a flat panel detector (FPD) of pixel size 194 micron and a high-resolution CMOS detector, the Dexela 1207 with pixel size of 75 microns. To investigate the effectiveness of the grid, a simulated artery block was placed in a modified uniform frontal head phantom and imaged with both the FPD and the Dexela for an approximately 15 × 15 cm field of view (FOV). The contrast improved for both detectors with the grid. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) does not increase as much in the case of the Dexela as it improves in the case of the FPD. Since the total noise in a single frame increases substantially for the Dexela compared to the FPD when the grid is used, the CNR is degraded. The increase in the quantum noise per frame would be similar for both detectors when the grid is used due to the attenuation of radiation, but the fixed pattern noise caused by the grid was substantially higher for the Dexela compared to the FPD and hence caused a severe reduction of CNR. Without further corrective methods this grid should not be used with high-resolution fluoroscopic detectors because the CNR does not improve significantly and the visibility of low contrast details may be reduced. Either an anti-scatter grid of different design or an additional image processing step when using a similar grid would be required to deal with the problem of scatter for high resolution detectors and the structured noise of the grid pattern.

Indexed as

anti-scatter gridCNRhigh-resolution detectorimage qualityscatter

Identifiers

PMID25309101
PMCPMC4189125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.