ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2014
Biomarkers for pancreatic cancer: recent achievements in proteomics and genomics through classical and multivariate statistical methods.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of telomere-related lncRNAs and immunological analysis in ovarian cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Biomarkers: Promising and valuable tools towards diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of Covid-19 and other diseases.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Increased SPHK1 and HAS2 Expressions Correlate to Poor Prognosis in Pancreatic Cancer.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- Immune Signature AgainstMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2020Article
- Prognostic value of pre-treatment peripheral blood markers in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and their association with S100A4 expression in tumor tissue.Oncology letters · 2019Article
- A Prospective Targeted Serum Metabolomics Study of Pancreatic Cancer in Postmenopausal Women.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2019Article
- Circulating pancreatic cancer exosomal RNAs for detection of pancreatic cancer.Molecular oncology · 2019Article
- Metabolomics approaches in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: tumor metabolism profiling predicts clinical outcome of patients.BMC medicine · 2017Article
- Sulfatase-2: a prognostic biomarker and candidate therapeutic target in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.British journal of cancer · 2016Article
- Plasma biomarker for detection of early stage pancreatic cancer and risk factors for pancreatic malignancy using antibodies for apolipoprotein-AII isoforms.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Proteomic approaches to identify circulating biomarkers in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2015Review
- Metabolomic Detection Between Pancreatic Cancer and Liver Metastasis Nude Mouse Models Constructed by Using the PANC1-KAI1/CDTechnology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
- Endoscopic ultrasound pin-points the precision medicine for pancreatic cancer.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most aggressive and lethal neoplastic diseases. A valid alternative to the usual invasive diagnostic tools would certainly be the determination of biomarkers in peripheral fluids to provide less invasive tools for early diagnosis. Nowadays, biomarkers are generally investigated mainly in peripheral blood and tissues through high-throughput omics techniques comparing control vs pathological samples. The results can be evaluated by two main strategies: (1) classical methods in which the identification of significant biomarkers is accomplished by monovariate statistical tests where each biomarker is considered as independent from the others; and (2) multivariate methods, taking into consideration the correlations existing among the biomarkers themselves. This last approach is very powerful since it allows the identification of pools of biomarkers with diagnostic and prognostic performances which are superior to single markers in terms of sensitivity, specificity and robustness. Multivariate techniques are usually applied with variable selection procedures to provide a restricted set of biomarkers with the best predictive ability; however, standard selection methods are usually aimed at the identification of the smallest set of variables with the best predictive ability and exhaustivity is usually neglected. The exhaustive search for biomarkers is instead an important alternative to standard variable selection since it can provide information about the etiology of the pathology by producing a comprehensive set of markers. In this review, the most recent applications of the omics techniques (proteomics, genomics and metabolomics) to the identification of exploratory biomarkers for PC will be presented with particular regard to the statistical methods adopted for their identification. The basic theory related to classical and multivariate methods for identification of biomarkers is presented and then, the most recent applications in this field are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.