Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25309064›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2014

Ever-changing endoscopic treatment for early gastric cancer: yesterday-today-tomorrow.

Mi-Young Kim, Jun-Hyung Cho, Joo Young Cho

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Recent developments and innovations in gastric cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mi-Young KimMi-Young Kim, Jun-Hyung Cho, Joo Young Cho, Digestive Disease Center, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Seoul 140-887, South Korea.
Jun-Hyung ChoMi-Young Kim, Jun-Hyung Cho, Joo Young Cho, Digestive Disease Center, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Seoul 140-887, South Korea.
Joo Young ChoMi-Young Kim, Jun-Hyung Cho, Joo Young Cho, Digestive Disease Center, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Seoul 140-887, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic resection has been an optimal treatment for selected patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) based on advances in endoscopic instruments and techniques. As endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been widely used for treatment of EGC along with expanding ESD indication, concerns have been asked to achieve curative resection for EGC while guaranteeing precise prediction of lymph node metastasis (LNM). Recently, new techniques including ESD or endoscopic full-thickness resection combined with sentinel node navigation enable minimal tumor resection and a laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in cases of EGC with high risk of LNM. This review covers the development and challenges of endoscopic treatment for EGC. Moreover, a new microscopic imaging and endoscopic techniques for precise endoscopic diagnosis and minimally invasive treatment of EGC are introduced.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaDiffusion of InnovationEarly Detection of CancerForecastingGastrectomyGastroscopyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansLymph Node ExcisionNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryStomach NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeConfocal laser endomicroscopyEarly gastric cancerEndoscopic resectionHybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgerySentinel node navigation

Identifiers

PMID25309064
PMCPMC4188885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.