ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2012
Vitamins E, A and B
Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Riboflavin for women's health and emerging microbiome strategies.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2024Review
- Evidence based recommendations for an optimal prenatal supplement for women in the US: vitamins and related nutrients.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2022Review
- Managing Migraine During Pregnancy and Lactation.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2016Review
- New Insights into the Pathogenesis of Preeclampsia - The Role of Nrf2 Activators and their Potential Therapeutic Impact.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2013Article
- Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy - A Life-Long Risk?!Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2013Article
- Preeclampsia - Aetiology, Current Diagnostics and Clinical Management, New Therapy Options and Future Perspectives.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the course of the prospective, randomized, double-blind trial the influence of a high-dose riboflavin substitution on the risk for preeclampsia was studied in a high-risk collective 1. The present contribution evaluates supplementary data from the already published PROPER trial. The patients were from the two study centers Mérida, Venezuela, and Moshi, Tanzania, they were randomized from the 20th week of pregnancy and received either 15 mg riboflavin daily or placebo. Clinical and laboratory checks were carried out at four-week intervals up to childbirth. Concerning the question of whether there is a relationship between the serum levels of antioxidative vitamins and the risk of developing preeclampsia, it was found that no relationship could be detected between the measured laboratory values of vitamins E, A and B
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.