Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25308545›Full record

ArticleMutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis2014

Single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) and Pig-a mutation assay in vivo-tools for genotoxicity testing from a regulatory perspective: a study of benzo[a]pyrene in Ogg1(-/-) mice.

Anne Graupner, Christine Instanes, Stephen D Dertinger, Jill Mari Andersen, Birgitte Lindeman, Tonje Danielsen Rongved, Gunnar Brunborg, Ann-Karin Olsen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne GraupnerDepartment of Chemicals and Radiation, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo 0403, Norway.
Christine InstanesDepartment of Chemicals and Radiation, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo 0403, Norway.
Stephen D DertingerLitron Laboratories, Rochester, NY 14623, United States.
Jill Mari AndersenDepartment of Chemicals and Radiation, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo 0403, Norway.
Birgitte LindemanDepartment of Chemicals and Radiation, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo 0403, Norway.
Tonje Danielsen RongvedDepartment of Chemicals and Radiation, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo 0403, Norway.
Gunnar BrunborgDepartment of Chemicals and Radiation, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo 0403, Norway.
Ann-Karin OlsenDepartment of Chemicals and Radiation, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo 0403, Norway. Electronic address: ann.karin.olsen@fhi.no.
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NOLitron Laboratories (United States) · US

Funding

Validation of a Rodent Mutagenicity AssayR44ES018017 · NIEHS · LITRON LABORATORIES, LTD. · PI DERTINGER, STEPHEN D · 2010 to 2012
$1.8M
NIEHS NIH HHS R44 ES018017NIEHS NIH HHS R44ES018017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The OECD has developed test guidelines (TG) to identify agents with genotoxic effects. The in vivo alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) assay is currently being prepared to become such a TG. The performance of a combined SCGE/Pig-a gene mutation study was evaluated with the prototypical genotoxicant benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) at an exposure level known to induce germ cell mutation. We aimed to better understand (i) the strengths and weaknesses of the two methods applied in blood and their potential to predict germ cell mutagenicity, and (ii) the involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) following in vivo BaP-exposure. To explore the involvement of ROS on BaP genotoxicity, we utilised a mouse model deficient in a DNA glycosylase. Specifically, C57BL/6 mice (Ogg1(+/+) and Ogg1(-/-)) were treated for three consecutive days with 50 mg BaP/kg/day. DNA damage in nucleated blood cells was measured four hours after the last treatment with the SCGE assay, with and without formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (Fpg). Pig-a mutant phenotype blood erythrocytes were analysed two and four weeks after treatment. BaP-induced DNA lesions were not significantly increased in either version of the SCGE assay. The phenotypic mutation frequencies for immature and mature erythrocytes were significantly increased after two weeks. These effects were not affected by genotype, suggesting oxidative damage may have a minor role in BaP genotoxicity, at least in the acute exposure situation studied here. While both assays are promising tools for risk assessment, these results highlight the necessity of understanding the limitations regarding each assay's ability to detect chemicals' genotoxic potential.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA GlycosylasesAnimalsBenzo(a)pyreneElectrophoresisErythrocytes, AbnormalMembrane ProteinsMiceMice, KnockoutMutagensMutationOxidative StressReactive Oxygen SpeciesBenzo(a)pyreneDNA GlycosylasesMembrane ProteinsMutagensOgg1 protein, mousephosphatidylinositol glycan-class A proteinReactive Oxygen SpeciesAlkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE)Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP)GenotoxicityHazard identificationPig-a mutation assayRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID25308545
PMCPMC4196198
OpenAlexW1989444398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.