Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25308539›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2015

Sustainable reduction of nasal colonization and hand contamination with Staphylococcus aureus in food handlers, 2002-2011.

J Ho, M Boost, M O'Donoghue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nasal carriage ofArhiv za higijenu rada i toksikologiju · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Modelling the growth of Staphylococcus aureus on cooked broccoli under isothermal conditions.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021
    Article
  4. Prevalence of enterotoxin genes in Staphylococcus aureus colonising food handlers: does nasal carriage status matter?European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J HoSchool of Nursing,The Hong Kong Polytechnic University,Hung Hom,Kowloon,Hong Kong.
M BoostSchool of Nursing,The Hong Kong Polytechnic University,Hung Hom,Kowloon,Hong Kong.
M O'DonoghueSchool of Nursing,The Hong Kong Polytechnic University,Hung Hom,Kowloon,Hong Kong.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A longitudinal study of nasal colonization and hand contamination of food handlers with Staphylococcus aureus commenced in 2002 prior to the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome. In the follow-up in 2003 when hygiene measures were strictly implemented, significant reductions in carriage were observed. To investigate if this change was sustained, nasal and hand carriage rates were compared between the earlier studies and a further sampling in 2011. The initial nasal carriage rate was 35% and hand contamination 41·2%, decreasing to 23·5% and 11·6%, respectively in 2003 (P < 0·001). In 2011, nasal carriage was similar to 2003 (22·9%), while hand contamination dropped further to 3·7% (P < 0·001). Spa-typing revealed 39 types in 2002 and 42 in 2011. This study reveals that the marked reduction in colonization had been sustained. This may be attributed to reduced opportunities for spread due to enhanced hygiene and reinforces its importance for control of disease.

Indexed as

Food HandlingStaphylococcus aureusAdultCarrier StateDisease OutbreaksFemaleHandHand HygieneHong KongHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisLongitudinal StudiesMaleNasal CavitySevere Acute Respiratory SyndromeSkinaureus

Identifiers

PMID25308539
PMCPMC9507221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.