Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25307958›Full record

ReviewBlood reviews2015

"No donor"? Consider a haploidentical transplant.

Stefan O Ciurea, Ulas D Bayraktar

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05968170 (A Feasibility Study Using the CliniMACS® Device for T-Cell Receptor), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05968170 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Feasibility Study Using the CliniMACS® Device for T-Cell Receptor (TCR) αβ+CD3+/CD19+ Depleted Hematopoietic Stem Cells for Patients Undergoing Transplant

TypeinterventionalSponsorNeena Kapoor, M.D.Ran2025 to 2035Enrolled0ConditionsGraft Vs Host Disease, Graft-versus-host-disease, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaArmsCliniMACS® device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Donor-derived CD4Bone marrow transplantation · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefan O CiureaDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: sciurea@mdanderson.org.
Ulas D BayraktarDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (HaploSCT) is an attractive option for patients requiring a hematopoietic stem cell transplant who do not have an HLA-matched donor, because it is cheaper, can be performed faster, and may extend transplantation to virtually all patients in need. Significant advances have been made in the recent decade with dramatic improvement in treatment outcomes. Historically, overcoming the HLA-incompatibility barrier has been a significant limitation to the expansion of this form of transplant. While ex vivo T-cell depletion effectively prevented the development of acute GVHD, it was associated with a higher treatment-related mortality, in excess of 40% in some series, due to a significant delay in recovery of the adaptive immune system. Newer methods have successfully maintained the memory T cells in the graft and/or selectively depleted alloreactive T cells, and are associated with improved treatment outcomes. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide for GVHD prevention has proven very effective in controlling GVHD with lower incidence of infectious complications and treatment-related mortality-as low as 7% at 1 year-and has become the new standard in how this transplant is performed. Here, we reviewed the current experience with this approach and various other strategies employed to control alloreactivity in this setting, including selective depletion of T cells from the graft, as well as we discuss post-transplantation therapy to prevent disease relapse and improve immunologic reconstitution.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCell EngineeringCyclophosphamideGraft vs Host DiseaseHaploidyHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKiller Cells, NaturalStem Cell TransplantationT-LymphocytesCyclophosphamideImmunosuppressive AgentsAlpha-beta T cell depletionCellular therapyGraft engineeringHaploidentical transplantationPost-transplantation cyclophosphamide

Identifiers

PMID25307958
PMCPMC4379127
OpenAlexW2092655798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.