ArticleBJU international2016
Radical cystectomy with super-extended lymphadenectomy: impact of separate vs en bloc lymph node submission on analysis and outcomes.
Article in BJU international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Before Versus After Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyPooled it
- The current role of pentafecta in the reporting of radical cystectomy outcomes: a scoping review.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Article
- Progress of fluorescence imaging in lymph node dissection surgery for prostate and bladder cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Updated pathology reporting standards for bladder cancer: biopsies, transurethral resections and radical cystectomies.World journal of urology · 2022Review
- Management Trends and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy for Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Evolution of the University of Southern California Experience over 3,347 Cases.The Journal of urology · 2022Article
- A Comprehensive Approach to Clinical Staging of Bladder Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Multicenter external validation of the radical cystectomy pentafecta in a European cohort of patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion for bladder cancer.World journal of urology · 2021Article
- Pathological reporting of cystectomy lymph nodes: a retrospective analysis of experience in Paris.World journal of urology · 2021Article
- Is there an oncological benefit to extended lymphadenectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer?Translational andrology and urology · 2020Review
- An EMT-related gene signature for the prognosis of human bladder cancer.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2020Article
- A practical guide to bladder cancer pathology.Nature reviews. Urology · 2018Review
- Lymph node dissection in bladder cancer: Where do we stand?World journal of urology · 2017Review
- Pelvic lymph node dissection before or after laparoscopic radical cystectomy: An ambispective study comparing ease of surgery and operative outcomes.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo update our previous analysis of the clinical and pathological impact of the change in the submission of lymphadenectomy specimens from en bloc to 13 separate anatomically defined packets, which took place at the University of Southern California in May 2002, and to determine whether lymph node (LN) packeting resulted in any change in oncological outcomes. PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 846 patients who underwent radical cystectomy (RC) with super-extended LN dissection for cTxN0M0 bladder cancer between January 1996 and December 2007 were identified. Specimens of 376 patients were sent en bloc (group 1), and specimens of 470 patients were sent in 13 separate anatomical packets (group 2).
resultsThe pathological tumour stage distribution and the proportion of LN-positive patients (group 1: 82 patients [22%] versus group 2: 99 patients [21%]; P = 0.80) were similar between the two groups: the median [range] number of total LNs identified increased significantly (group 1: 32 [10-97] versus group 2: 65 [10-179]; P < 0.001). LN density decreased (group 1, 11% versus group 2, 4%; P = 0.005). The median [range] number of positive LNs removed was similar (group 1: 0 [0-30] versus group 2: 0 [0-97]; P = 0.87). No nodal stage shift was observed. The 5-year overall survival (group 1: 58% versus group 2: 59%; P = 0.65) and recurrence-free survival rates (group 1: 68% versus group 2: 70%; P = 0.57) were similar.
conclusionsThe incidence of patients with positive LNs remained unchanged, regardless of how the LN specimen was submitted. Submitting 13 separate nodal packets significantly increased the total LN yield, but did not result in a significant increase in the number of positive LNs or a consecutive nodal stage shift and did not affect oncological outcomes. Based on these results LN density is not an accurate prognosticator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.