Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25307752›Full record

ArticleThe Prostate2015

Dietary influences on tissue concentrations of phytanic acid and AMACR expression in the benign human prostate.

Yachana Kataria, Margaret Wright, Ryan J Deaton, Erika Enk Rueter, Benjamin A Rybicki, Ann B Moser, Vijayalakshmi Ananthanrayanan, Peter H Gann

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Prostate, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Phytol and its metabolites phytanic and pristanic acids for risk of cancer: current evidence and future directions.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2020
    Review
  3. The peroxisome: an update on mysteries 2.0.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2018
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yachana KatariaDepartment of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Margaret Wright
Ryan J Deaton
Erika Enk Rueter
Benjamin A Rybicki
Ann B Moser
Vijayalakshmi Ananthanrayanan
Peter H Gann
University of Illinois Chicago · USAmerican Academy of Pediatrics · USHenry Ford Health System · USKennedy Krieger Institute · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION IN PROSTATE CANCERR01ES011126 · NIEHS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI RYBICKI, BENJAMIN A. · 2000 to 2017
$8.0M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES011126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) is an enzyme involved in fatty acid metabolism that is markedly over-expressed in virtually all prostate cancers (PCa), relative to benign tissue. One of AMACR's primary substrates, phytanic acid, is derived predominately from red meat and dairy product consumption. Epidemiological evidence suggests links between dairy/red meat intake, as well as phytanic acid levels, and elevated PCa risk. This study investigates the relationships among dietary intake, serum and tissue concentrations of phytanic acid, and AMACR expression (mRNA and protein) in the histologically benign human prostate.

methodsMen undergoing radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localized disease provided a food frequency questionnaire (n = 68), fasting blood (n = 35), benign fresh frozen prostate tissue (n = 26), and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections (n = 67). Serum and tissue phytanic acid concentrations were obtained by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. We extracted RNA from epithelial cells using laser capture microdissection and quantified mRNA expression of AMACR and other genes involved in the peroxisomal phytanic acid metabolism pathway via qRT-PCR. Immunohistochemistry for AMACR was performed on FFPE sections and subsequently quantified via digital image analysis. Associations between diet, serum, and tissue phytanic acid levels, as well as AMACR and other gene expression levels were assessed by partial Spearman correlation coefficients.

resultsHigh-fat dairy intake was the strongest predictor of circulating phytanic acid concentrations (r = 0.35, P = 0.04). Tissue phytanic acid concentrations were not associated with any dietary sources and were only weakly correlated with serum levels (r = 0.29, P = 0.15). AMACR gene expression was not associated with serum phytanic acid (r = 0.13, P = 0.47), prostatic phytanic acid concentrations (r = 0.03, P = 0.88), or AMACR protein expression (r = -0.16, P = 0.20).

conclusionsOur data underscore the complexity of the relationship between AMACR and its substrates and do not support the unifying hypothesis that excess levels of dietary phytanic acid are responsible for both the overexpression of AMACR in prostate cancer and the potential association between PCa risk and intake of dairy foods and red meat.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorDairy ProductsDiet, High-FatGene Expression Regulation, EnzymologicGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhytanic AcidProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRacemases and EpimerasesTissue Distributionalpha-methylacyl-CoA racemaseBiomarkers, TumorPhytanic AcidRacemases and EpimerasesAMACRbiomarkerdietphytanic acidprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID25307752
PMCPMC4778716
OpenAlexW1939026207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.