Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25307488›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2015

Multivariate decoding of cerebral blood flow measures in a clinical model of on-going postsurgical pain.

Jonathan O'Muircheartaigh, Andre Marquand, Duncan J Hodkinson, Kristina Krause, Nadine Khawaja, Tara F Renton, John P Huggins, William Vennart, Steven C R Williams, Matthew A Howard

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Moving towards the use of artificial intelligence in pain management.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonathan O'MuircheartaighDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andre Marquand
Duncan J Hodkinson
Kristina Krause
Nadine Khawaja
Tara F Renton
John P Huggins
William Vennart
Steven C R Williams
Matthew A Howard
King's College London · GBWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GBPfizer (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J005142/1Wellcome Trust 096195Wellcome Trust WT088641/Z/09/ZWellcome Trust WT096195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent reports of multivariate machine learning (ML) techniques have highlighted their potential use to detect prognostic and diagnostic markers of pain. However, applications to date have focussed on acute experimental nociceptive stimuli rather than clinically relevant pain states. These reports have coincided with others describing the application of arterial spin labeling (ASL) to detect changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in patients with on-going clinical pain. We combined these acquisition and analysis methodologies in a well-characterized postsurgical pain model. The principal aims were (1) to assess the classification accuracy of rCBF indices acquired prior to and following surgical intervention and (2) to optimise the amount of data required to maintain accurate classification. Twenty male volunteers, requiring bilateral, lower jaw third molar extraction (TME), underwent ASL examination prior to and following individual left and right TME, representing presurgical and postsurgical states, respectively. Six ASL time points were acquired at each exam. Each ASL image was preceded by visual analogue scale assessments of alertness and subjective pain experiences. Using all data from all sessions, an independent Gaussian Process binary classifier successfully discriminated postsurgical from presurgical states with 94.73% accuracy; over 80% accuracy could be achieved using half of the data (equivalent to 15 min scan time). This work demonstrates the concept and feasibility of time-efficient, probabilistic prediction of clinically relevant pain at the individual level. We discuss the potential of ML techniques to impact on the search for novel approaches to diagnosis, management, and treatment to complement conventional patient self-reporting.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAdultCerebrovascular CirculationDiscriminant AnalysisFeasibility StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMolar, ThirdMultivariate AnalysisNormal DistributionPain MeasurementPostoperative PainSensitivity and SpecificityTooth ExtractionYoung Adultarterial spin labelingbiomarkermachine learningpain

Identifiers

PMID25307488
PMCPMC4322468
OpenAlexW2116132316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.