ArticleHarm reduction journal2014
Establishing a community-based participatory research partnership among people who use drugs in Ottawa: the PROUD cohort study.
Article in Harm reduction journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- "Being treated as the expert:" A blueprint for a community advisory board approach to elevate the voice of people with living experience with substance use in academic research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- "I'm not a graduate or doctor, yet we are all together:" articulating a partnership model for community-engaged research.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Engaging people with lived experience on community advisory boards in community-based participatory research: a scoping review.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- CENTER-ing Black voices: incorporating lived experience across the research process to advance equity in drug treatment and outcomes.Harm reduction journal · 2025Article
- Overdose response centering inequity and diversity study: a protocol for assessing the population-level and equity impact of the emergency medical services system changes using critical race theory.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Differences in characteristics and interactions with close contacts among PWID in the San Diego Border Region before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of migration and health · 2024Article
- Article
- Overdose education and naloxone distribution program design informed by people who use drugs and naloxone distributors.Preventive medicine reports · 2023Article
- Doing community-based research during dual public health emergencies (COVID and overdose).Harm reduction journal · 2023Article
- The generative potential of mess in community-based participatory research with young people who use(d) drugs in Vancouver.Harm reduction journal · 2022Article
- Cohort study of team-based care among marginalized people who use drugs in Ottawa.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022Article
- Preferences regarding emerging HIV prevention technologies among Toronto men who have sex with men: a discrete choice experiment.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Community-engaged healthcare model for currently under-served individuals involved in the healthcare system.SSM - population health · 2021Review
- A cross-sectional study of factors associated with unstable housing among marginalized people who use drugs in Ottawa, Canada.PloS one · 2021Article
- Engagement in primary health care among marginalized people who use drugs in Ottawa, Canada.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Hiring, training, and supporting Peer Research Associates: Operationalizing community-based research principles within epidemiological studies by, with, and for women living with HIV.Harm reduction journal · 2019Article
- Partnering with persons in long-term recovery from substance use disorder: experiences from a collaborative research project.Harm reduction journal · 2019Article
- Achieving meaningful participation of people who use drugs and their peer organizations in a strategic research partnership.Harm reduction journal · 2019Article
- Participant, peer and PEEP: considerations and strategies for involving people who have used illicit substances as assistants and advisors in research.BMC public health · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGrounded in a community-based participatory research (CBPR) framework, the PROUD (Participatory Research in Ottawa: Understanding Drugs) Study aims to better understand HIV risk and prevalence among people who use drugs in Ottawa, Ontario. The purpose of this paper is to describe the establishment of the PROUD research partnership.
methodsPROUD relies on peers' expertise stemming from their lived experience with drug use to guide all aspects of this CBPR project. A Community Advisory Committee (CAC), comprised of eight people with lived experience, three allies and three ex-officio members, has been meeting since May 2012 to oversee all aspects of the project. Eleven medical students from the University of Ottawa were recruited to work alongside the committee. Training was provided on CBPR; HIV and harm reduction; and administering HIV point-of-care (POC) tests so that the CAC can play a key role in research design, data collection, analysis, and knowledge translation activities.
resultsFrom March-December 2013, the study enrolled 858 participants who use drugs (defined as anyone who has injected or smoked drugs other than marijuana in the last 12 months) into a prospective cohort study. Participants completed a one-time questionnaire administered by a trained peer or medical student, who then administered an HIV POC test. Recruitment, interviews and testing occurred in both the fixed research site and various community settings across Ottawa. With consent, prospective follow-up will occur through linkages to health care records available through the Institute for Clinical and Evaluation Sciences.
conclusionThe PROUD Study meaningfully engaged the communities of people who use drugs in Ottawa through the formation of the CAC, the training of peers as community-based researchers, and integrated KTE throughout the research project. This project successfully supported skill development across the team and empowered people with drug use experience to take on leadership roles, ensuring that this research process will promote change at the local level. The CBPR methods developed in this study provide important insights for future research projects with people who use drugs in other settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.