Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25306390›Full record

ReviewStem cell research2014

Cardiac regeneration based on mechanisms of cardiomyocyte proliferation and differentiation.

Samuel E Senyo, Richard T Lee, Bernhard Kühn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Cardiomyocyte nuclear remodeling after mechanical unloading.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mechanisms and implications of sex differences in cardiac aging.The journal of cardiovascular aging · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samuel E SenyoDepartment of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Brigham Regenerative Medicine Center, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Richard T LeeDepartment of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Brigham Regenerative Medicine Center, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Bernhard KühnHarvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: Bernhard.kuhn2@CHP.edu.

Funding

Role of Single Cell mRNA Variation in Systems Associated Electrically Excitable CU01MH098953 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI EBERWINE, JAMES H, KIM, JUNHYONG · 2012 to 2016
$11.4M
Myofibril disassembly during neonatal heart muscle cell proliferationR01HL106302 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KUHN, BERNHARD · 2011 to 2015
$2.1M
Aging and Myocardial Progenitor RecruitmentR01AG032977 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LEE, RICHARD T · 2009 to 2013
$1.9M
Cardiomyocyte Lineage and Turnover by Metabolic Fate-MappingR01AG040019 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LEE, RICHARD T · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
Periostin in Myocardial Injury and RegenerationK08HL085143 · NHLBI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI KUHN, BERNHARD · 2009 to 2013
$645k
Engineering ErbB receptor biasing for regenerating infarcted myocardiumF32HL108570 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SENYO, SAMUEL · 2011 to 2013
$166k
NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL108570NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL085143NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL106302NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL106302NIA NIH HHS AG032977NIA NIH HHS AG040019NIA NIH HHS R01 AG032977NIA NIH HHS R01 AG040019NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH098953NIMH NIH HHS U01MH098953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiomyocyte proliferation and progenitor differentiation are endogenous mechanisms of myocardial development. Cardiomyocytes continue to proliferate in mammals for part of post-natal development. In adult mammals under homeostatic conditions, cardiomyocytes proliferate at an extremely low rate. Because the mechanisms of cardiomyocyte generation provide potential targets for stimulating myocardial regeneration, a deep understanding is required for developing such strategies. We will discuss approaches for examining cardiomyocyte regeneration, review the specific advantages, challenges, and controversies, and recommend approaches for interpretation of results. We will also draw parallels between developmental and regenerative principles of these mechanisms and how they could be targeted for treating heart failure.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCell ProliferationRegenerationAnimalsHeartHumansMyocytes, CardiacStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID25306390
PMCPMC4435693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.