Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25306139›Full record

Trial reportParasites & vectors2014

Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus aquaporin as an effective vaccine antigen to protect against cattle tick infestations.

Felix D Guerrero, Renato Andreotti, Kylie G Bendele, Rodrigo C Cunha, Robert J Miller, Kathleen Yeater, Adalberto A Pérez de León

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Parasites & vectors, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Recent Advances in Tick Antigen Discovery and Anti-Tick Vaccine Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Tick Vaccines and Concealed versus Exposed Antigens.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. First Data onPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Anti-Tick Vaccines: Current Advances and Future Prospects.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Felix D GuerreroUSDA-ARS Knipling Bushland US Livestock Insect Research Laboratory, 2700 Fredericksburg Rd., Kerrville, TX, 78028, USA. Felix.Guerrero@ars.usda.gov.
Renato AndreottiEMBRAPA Beef Cattle, Avenida Radio Maia, 830-Vila Popular, Caixa postal n. 154, CEP79106-550, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil. renato.andreotti@embrapa.br.
Kylie G BendeleUSDA-ARS Knipling Bushland US Livestock Insect Research Laboratory, 2700 Fredericksburg Rd., Kerrville, TX, 78028, USA. Kylie.Bendele@ars.usda.gov.
Rodrigo C CunhaEMBRAPA Beef Cattle, Avenida Radio Maia, 830-Vila Popular, Caixa postal n. 154, CEP79106-550, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil. Rodrigocunha_vet@hotmail.com.
Robert J MillerUSDA-ARS Cattle Fever Tick Research Laboratory, 22675 North Moorefield Rd., Edinburg, TX, 78541, USA. Robert.Miller@ars.usda.gov.
Kathleen YeaterUSDA-ARS Southern Plains Area Office, 1001 Holleman Drive East, College Station, TX, 77845, USA. kathleen.yeater@ars.usda.gov.
Adalberto A Pérez de LeónUSDA-ARS Knipling Bushland US Livestock Insect Research Laboratory, 2700 Fredericksburg Rd., Kerrville, TX, 78028, USA. Beto.PerezdeLeon@ars.usda.gov.
Agricultural Research Service · USBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccination as a control method against the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus has been practiced since the introduction of two products in the mid-1990s. There is a need for a vaccine that could provide effective control of R. microplus in a more consistent fashion than existing products. During our transcriptome studies of R. microplus, several gene coding regions were discovered to encode proteins with significant amino acid similarity to aquaporins.

methodsA cDNA encoding an aquaporin from the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus microplus, was isolated from transcriptomic studies conducted on gut tissues dissected from fully engorged adult female R. microplus.

resultsBioinformatic analysis indicates this aquaporin, designated RmAQP1, shows greatest amino acid similarity to the human aquaporin 7 family. Members of this family of water-conducting channels can also facilitate the transport of glycerol in addition to water. The efficacy of this aquaporin as an antigen against the cattle tick was explored in cattle vaccine trials conducted in Brazil. A cDNA encoding a significant portion of RmAQP1 was expressed as a recombinant protein in Pichia pastoris, purified under native conditions using a polyhistidine C-terminus tag and nickel affinity chromatography, emulsified with Montanide adjuvant, and cattle vaccinated intramuscularly. The recombinant protein provided 75% and 68% efficacy in two cattle pen trials conducted in Campo Grande, Brazil on groups of 6 one year old Holstein calves.

conclusionThe effectiveness of this vaccine in reducing the numbers of adult female ticks shows this aquaporin antigen holds promise as an active ingredient in cattle vaccines targeted against infestations of R. microplus.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntigensAquaporinsBase SequenceBrazilCattleComputational BiologyMolecular Sequence DataMultigene FamilyPhylogenyRhipicephalusVaccinesAntigensAquaporinsVaccines

Identifiers

PMID25306139
PMCPMC4200143
OpenAlexW2132153035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.