Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25305533›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2014

New approaches to understanding the spatial organization of bacterial genomes.

Tung Bk Le, Michael T Laub

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Form and function of archaeal genomes.Biochemical Society transactions · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Transcription of Bacterial Chromatin.Journal of molecular biology · 2019
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bacterial chromosome organization and segregation.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2015
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tung Bk LeDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Michael T LaubDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. Electronic address: laub@mit.edu.

Funding

Cell Cycle Regulation in Caulobacter CrescentusR01GM082899 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LAUB, MICHAEL · 2008 to 2020
$3.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM082899NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM082899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In all organisms, chromosomal DNA must be compacted nearly three orders of magnitude to fit within the limited volume of a cell. However, chromosomes cannot be haphazardly packed, and instead must adopt structures compatible with numerous cellular processes, including DNA replication, chromosome segregation, recombination, and gene expression. Recent technical advances have dramatically enhanced our understanding of how chromosomes are organized in vivo and have begun to reveal the mechanisms and forces responsible. Here, we review the current arsenal of techniques used to query chromosome structure, focusing first on single-cell fluorescence microscopy approaches that directly examine chromosome structure and then on population-averaged biochemical methods that infer chromosome structure based on the interaction frequencies of different loci. We describe the power of these techniques, highlighting the major advances they have produced while also discussing their limitations.

Indexed as

Genetic StructuresBacteriaChromosomes, BacterialCytogenetic AnalysisDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsGenetic LociGenome, BacterialMicroscopyRecombination, GeneticDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25305533
PMCPMC4258129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.