Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25304984›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation2015

Understanding by older patients of dialysis and conservative management for chronic kidney failure.

Sarah Tonkin-Crine, Ikumi Okamoto, Geraldine M Leydon, Fliss E M Murtagh, Ken Farrington, Fergus Caskey, Hugh Rayner, Paul Roderick

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. 67 national-level factors potentially related to the incidence of kidney replacement therapy across Europe.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Dialysis in the Elderly: A Practical Guide for the Clinician.International journal of nephrology · 2025
    Review
  15. Choosing conservative care in advanced chronic kidney disease: a scoping review of patients' perspectives.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2024
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah Tonkin-CrinePrimary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom. Electronic address: sktc1o07@soton.ac.uk.
Ikumi OkamotoPrimary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Geraldine M LeydonPrimary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Fliss E M MurtaghDepartment of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ken FarringtonRenal Unit, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, United Kingdom.
Fergus CaskeyRenal Unit, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Hugh RaynerDepartment of Renal Medicine, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Paul RoderickPrimary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
University of Southampton · GBHeart of England NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBLister Hospital · GBSouthmead Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health 09/2000/36
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adults with chronic kidney disease stage 5 may be offered a choice between dialysis and conservative management. Few studies have explored patients' reasons for choosing conservative management and none have compared the views of those who have chosen different treatments across renal units. STUDY

designQualitative study with semistructured interviews. SETTINGS &

participantsPatients 75 years or older recruited from 9 renal units. Units were chosen to reflect variation in the scale of delivery of conservative management. METHODOLOGY: Semistructured interviews audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

results42 interviews were completed, 4 to 6 per renal unit. Patients were sampled from those receiving dialysis, those preparing for dialysis, and those choosing conservative management. 14 patients in each group were interviewed. Patients who had chosen different treatments held varying beliefs about what dialysis could offer. The information that patients reported receiving from clinical staff differed between units. Patients from units with a more established conservative management pathway were more aware of conservative management, less often believed that dialysis would guarantee longevity, and more often had discussed the future with staff. Some patients receiving conservative management reported that they would have dialysis if they became unwell in the future, indicating the conditional nature of their decision. LIMITATIONS: Recruitment of older adults with frailty and comorbid conditions was difficult and therefore transferability of findings to this population is limited.

conclusionsOlder adults with chronic kidney disease stage 5 who have chosen different treatment options have contrasting beliefs about the likely outcomes of dialysis for those who are influenced by information provided by renal units. Supporting renal staff in discussing conservative management as a valid alternative to dialysis for a subset of patients will aid informed decision making. There is a need for better evidence about conservative management to support shared decision making for older people with chronic kidney failure.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorComprehensionDisease ManagementAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMalePatient Education as TopicRenal DialysisSurveys and Questionnairesadvanced care planningChronic kidney diseaseconservative careconservative managementdecision makingdialysisend-of-life careend-stage renal disease (ESRD)geriatricolder adultsqualitativerenal replacement therapy (RRT)supportive care

Identifiers

PMID25304984
PMCPMC4339698
OpenAlexW2098067747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.