ReviewCurrent opinion in pediatrics2014
An approach to pediatric exome and genome sequencing.
Review in Current opinion in pediatrics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges in genetic testing: clinician variant interpretation processes and the impact on clinical care.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021Article
- Genetic Testing in Neurodevelopmental Disorders.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Review
- Stickler Syndrome: A Review of Clinical Manifestations and the Genetics Evaluation.Journal of personalized medicine · 2020Review
- My46: a Web-based tool for self-guided management of genomic test results in research and clinical settings.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2017Article
- Ethical issues in pediatric genetic testing and screening.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2016Review
- Legal approaches regarding health-care decisions involving minors: implications for next-generation sequencing.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2016Article
- A first-line diagnostic assay for limb-girdle muscular dystrophy and other myopathies.Human genomics · 2016Article
- Toward clinical genomics in everyday medicine: perspectives and recommendations.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2016Article
- A novel PCCB mutation in a Thai patient with propionic acidemia identified by exome sequencing.Human genome variation · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewExome and genome sequencing have recently emerged as clinical tools to resolve undiagnosed genetic conditions. Protocols are critically needed to identify proper patients for testing, select a test and laboratory, engage parents in shared decision-making, and for the return of results. RECENT
findingsAmong well selected patients, the likelihood for identifying the causative gene change may be as high as 30%. It is key for pediatricians to consider whether sequencing should be the primary line of pursuit of a molecular diagnosis. Parents should understand the uncertainties inherent in this sequencing and the preference-based nature of testing. Pediatricians can engage in shared decision-making for this process and work to help parents make decisions consistent with their priorities and values. Upon receipt of a pathogenic mutation, discussion of the likelihood for future treatment is paramount to parents, as are the implications for recurrence within the family. Uncertainties inherent to genomic results need to be explained in the context of the likelihood of future research and discoveries. SUMMARY: Pediatricians should make a deliberate decision with each patient whether to manage genomic testing on their own, refer the patient for such testing, or initiate the process and refer simultaneously. Regardless of which approach is taken, understanding the basics of this testing will allow the pediatrician to support the parents through the diagnostic process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.