Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25304947›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2014

Secondary analysis of RTOG 9508, a phase 3 randomized trial of whole-brain radiation therapy versus WBRT plus stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with 1-3 brain metastases; poststratified by the graded prognostic assessment (GPA).

Paul W Sperduto, Ryan Shanley, Xianghua Luo, David Andrews, Maria Werner-Wasik, Richard Valicenti, Jean-Paul Bahary, Luis Souhami, Minhee Won, Minesh Mehta

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 173 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. DEGRO guideline for personalized radiotherapy of brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in patients with breast cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Whole brain radiotherapy and simultaneous integrated boost: is it still a viable treatment for multiple brain metastases in the era of SRS?Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Recent trends in radiotherapy use for major cancers in Korea.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul W SperdutoMetro-Minnesota CCOP and Minneapolis Radiation Oncology, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Electronic address: psperduto@mropa.com.
Ryan ShanleyMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Xianghua LuoMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
David AndrewsThomas Jefferson University, Department of NeuroOncology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Maria Werner-WasikThomas Jefferson University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Richard ValicentiUC Davis Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sacramento, California.
Jean-Paul BaharyCHUM Hospital Notre Dame, Quebec, Canada.
Luis SouhamiMcGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Minhee WonNRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Minesh MehtaUniversity of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, Maryland.
Thomas Jefferson University · USHôpital Notre-Dame · CAMcGill University · CANRG Oncology · USUniversity of California Davis Medical Center · USUniversity of Maryland Medical System · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
RTOG Foreign AccrualU10CA021661 · NCI · AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY · PI CURRAN, WALTER J. · 1985 to 2013
$150.3M
NRG Oncology NCORP Research Base-BIQSFPUG1CA189867 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Deborah Watkins Bruner, Lisa A. Kachnic · 2014 to 2026
$140.5M
Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Douglas Yee · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
RTOG Foreign AccrualsU10CA037422 · NCI · AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY · PI BRUNER, DEBORAH WATKINS · 1985 to 2013
$30.4M
NCATS NIH HHS 8UL1TR000114-02NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NCI NIH HHS P30 CA77598NCI NIH HHS U10 CA021661NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037422NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS U10 CA21661NCI NIH HHS U10 CA37422NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRadiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9508 showed a survival advantage for patients with 1 but not 2 or 3 brain metastasis (BM) treated with whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) versus WBRT alone. An improved prognostic index, the graded prognostic assessment (GPA) has been developed. Our hypothesis was that if the data from RTOG 9508 were poststratified by the GPA, the conclusions may vary. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this analysis, 252 of the 331 patients were evaluable by GPA. Of those, 211 had lung cancer. Breast cancer patients were excluded because the components of the breast GPA are not in the RTOG database. Multiple Cox regression was used to compare survival between treatment groups, adjusting for GPA. Treatment comparisons within subgroups were performed with the log-rank test. A free online tool (brainmetgpa.com) simplified GPA use.

resultsThe fundamental conclusions of the primary analysis were confirmed in that there was no survival benefit overall for patients with 1 to 3 metastases; however, there was a benefit for the subset of patients with GPA 3.5 to 4.0 (median survival time [MST] for WBRT + SRS vs WBRT alone was 21.0 versus 10.3 months, P=.05) regardless of the number of metastases. Among patients with GPA 3.5 to 4.0 treated with WBRT and SRS, the MST for patients with 1 versus 2 to 3 metastases was 21 and 14.1 months, respectively.

conclusionsThis secondary analysis of predominantly lung cancer patients, consistent with the original analysis, shows no survival advantage for the group overall when treated with WBRT and SRS; however, in patients with high GPA (3.5-4), there is a survival advantage regardless of whether they have 1, 2, or 3 BM. This benefit did not extend to patients with lower GPA. Prospective validation of this survival benefit for patients with multiple BM and high GPA when treated with WBRT and SRS is warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyCranial IrradiationFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedPrognosisRadiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID25304947
PMCPMC4700538
OpenAlexW2154704485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.