Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25304881›Full record

Trial reportTargeted oncology2015

Panitumumab as a radiosensitizing agent in KRAS wild-type locally advanced rectal cancer.

Feby Ingriani Mardjuadi, Javier Carrasco, Jean-Charles Coche, Christine Sempoux, Anne Jouret-Mourin, Pierre Scalliet, Jean-Charles Goeminne, Jean-François Daisne, Thierry Delaunoit, Peter Vuylsteke and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Targeted oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Drivers of Radioresistance in Prostate Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Feby Ingriani MardjuadiInstitut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Pôle d'imagerie médicale, radiothérapie et oncologie (IREC/MIRO), Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Javier Carrasco
Jean-Charles Coche
Christine Sempoux
Anne Jouret-Mourin
Pierre Scalliet
Jean-Charles Goeminne
Jean-François Daisne
Thierry Delaunoit
Peter Vuylsteke
Yves Humblet
Nicolas Meert
Marc van den Eynde
Anne Moxhon
Karin Haustermans
Jean-Luc Canon
Jean-Pascal Machiels
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEClinique Saint-Joseph · BEGrand Charleroi Hospital · BEClinique Saint Pierre · BEHôpital de Jolimont · BEKU Leuven · BEUCLouvain · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our goal was to optimize the radiosensitizing potential of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies, when given concomitantly with preoperative radiotherapy in KRAS wild-type locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Based on pre-clinical studies conducted by our group, we designed a phase II trial in which panitumumab (6 mg/kg/q2 weeks) was combined with preoperative radiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions) to treat cT3-4/N + KRAS wild-type LARC. The primary endpoint was complete pathologic response (pCR) (H0 = 5%, H1 = 17%, α = 0.05, β = 0.2). From 19 enrolled patients, 17 (89%) were evaluable for pathology assessment. Although no pCR was observed, seven patients (41%) had grade 3 Dworak pathological tumor regression. The regimen was safe and was associated with 95% of sphincter-preservation rate. No NRAS, BRAF, or PI3KCA mutation was found in this study, but one patient (5%) showed loss of PTEN expression. The quantification of plasma EGFR ligands during treatment showed significant upregulation of plasma TGF-α and EGF following panitumumab administration (p < 0.05). At surgery, patients with important pathological regression (grade 3 Dworak) had higher plasma TGF-α (p = 0.03) but lower plasma EGF (p = 0.003) compared to those with grade 0-2 Dworak. Our study suggests that concomitant panitumumab and preoperative radiotherapy in KRAS wild-type LARC is feasible and results in some tumor regression. However, pCR rate remained modest. Given that the primary endpoint of our study was not reached, we remain unable to recommend the use of panitumumab as a radiosensitizer in KRAS wild-type LARC outside a research setting.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansLigandsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPanitumumabProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Radiation-Sensitizing AgentsRadiotherapyRectal NeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsKRAS protein, humanLigandsPanitumumabProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Radiation-Sensitizing Agents

Identifiers

PMID25304881
OpenAlexW2172785244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.