Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25304511›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2015

Proximity effect among cellulose-degrading enzymes displayed on the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell surface.

Jungu Bae, Kouichi Kuroda, Mitsuyoshi Ueda

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Cell-surface engineering of yeasts for whole-cell biocatalysts.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. EngineeredBioengineered · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Destructuring plant biomass: focus on fungal and extremophilic cell wall hydrolases.Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jungu BaeDivision of Applied Life Sciences, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kouichi KurodaDivision of Applied Life Sciences, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Mitsuyoshi UedaDivision of Applied Life Sciences, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan miueda@kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Kyoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proximity effect is a form of synergistic effect exhibited when cellulases work within a short distance from each other, and this effect can be a key factor in enhancing saccharification efficiency. In this study, we evaluated the proximity effect between 3 cellulose-degrading enzymes displayed on the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell surface, that is, endoglucanase, cellobiohydrolase, and β-glucosidase. We constructed 2 kinds of arming yeasts through genome integration: ALL-yeast, which simultaneously displayed the 3 cellulases (thus, the different cellulases were near each other), and MIX-yeast, a mixture of 3 kinds of single-cellulase-displaying yeasts (the cellulases were far apart). The cellulases were tagged with a fluorescence protein or polypeptide to visualize and quantify their display. To evaluate the proximity effect, we compared the activities of ALL-yeast and MIX-yeast with respect to degrading phosphoric acid-swollen cellulose after adjusting for the cellulase amounts. ALL-yeast exhibited 1.25-fold or 2.22-fold higher activity than MIX-yeast did at a yeast concentration equal to the yeast cell number in 1 ml of yeast suspension with an optical density (OD) at 600 nm of 10 (OD10) or OD0.1. At OD0.1, the distance between the 3 cellulases was greater than that at OD10 in MIX-yeast, but the distance remained the same in ALL-yeast; thus, the difference between the cellulose-degrading activities of ALL-yeast and MIX-yeast increased (to 2.22-fold) at OD0.1, which strongly supports the proximity effect between the displayed cellulases. A proximity effect was also observed for crystalline cellulose (Avicel). We expect the proximity effect to further increase when enzyme display efficiency is enhanced, which would further increase cellulose-degrading activity. This arming yeast technology can also be applied to examine proximity effects in other diverse fields.

Indexed as

beta-GlucosidaseCellulaseCelluloseCellulose 1,4-beta-CellobiosidaseMembrane ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaebeta-GlucosidaseCellulaseCelluloseCellulose 1,4-beta-CellobiosidaseMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25304511
PMCPMC4272747
OpenAlexW2032381569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.