Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25304253›Full record

ReviewMusculoskeletal surgery2015

Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a literature review.

L Camarda, A D'Arienzo, S Morello, G Peri, B Valentino, M D'Arienzo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. PSI kinematic versus non-PSI mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2017
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evolution of TKA design.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2017
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

L CamardaClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica, Dipartimento di Discipline Chirurgiche, Oncologiche e Stomatologiche, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Via del Vespro, 90100, Palermo, Italy, lawrence.camarda@unipa.it.
A D'Arienzo
S Morello
G Peri
B Valentino
M D'Arienzo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the past decade, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been markedly increased. Recently, patient-specific custom cutting guides have been commercially introduced in order to achieve an accurate component alignment during TKA. In fact, these cutting blocks are specific to a patient's knee anatomy and should help the surgeons to perform bone cuts, reducing the complexity of conventional alignment and sizing tools. Nevertheless, there are critical arguments against patient-specific cutting guides for routine use, such as poor evidence and higher costs. Additionally, there are still no mild and long-term results available that describe the clinical outcomes following patient-specific instrumentation of TKR, cost-effectiveness and lower revision rates. Aim of the current manuscript was to describe the recent improvements of the surgical technique and instrumentation of TKA, reviewing the recent literature concerning the PSI technology.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeEvidence-Based MedicineHumansKnee JointKnee ProsthesisMagnetic Resonance ImagingPractice Guidelines as TopicSurgery, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.