Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25304020›Full record

ArticleMedical care2014

The next step towards making use meaningful: electronic information exchange and care coordination across clinicians and delivery sites.

Ilana Graetz, Mary Reed, Stephen M Shortell, Thomas G Rundall, Jim Bellows, John Hsu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Investigating the effect of the Vula Mobile app on coordination of care and capacity building in district health services, Cape Town: Convergent mixed methods study.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Data Content and Exchange in General Practice: a Review.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ilana Graetz*Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA †Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN ‡School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley §Care Management Institute Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA ∥Mongan Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital ¶Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Mary Reed
Stephen M Shortell
Thomas G Rundall
Jim Bellows
John Hsu

Funding

Impact of Integrated Patient-Facing Health IT Tools on Quality and Resource Use for Patients with DiabetesR01DK085070 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI REED, MARY · 2010 to 2019
$4.4M
Impact of Health Information Technology on Clinical CareR01HS015280 · AHRQ · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HSU, JOHN · 2004 to 2006
$497k
EHR use and care coordinationR36HS021082 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI GRAETZ, ILANA · 2011 to 2011
$41k
AHRQ HHS 1R36HS021082AHRQ HHS R01 HS015280AHRQ HHS R01HS015280AHRQ HHS R36 HS021082NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK085070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCare for patients with chronic conditions often requires coordination between multiple physicians and delivery sites. Electronic Health Record (EHR) use could improve care quality and efficiency in part by facilitating care coordination.

objectiveWe examined the association between EHR use and clinician perceptions of care coordination for patients transferred across clinicians and delivery sites. RESEARCH

designRepeated surveys of primary care clinicians during the staggered implementation of an outpatient EHR (2005-2008), followed by an integrated inpatient EHR (2006-2010). We measured the association between EHR use stages (no use, outpatient EHR only, and integrated inpatient-outpatient EHR) and care coordination using logistic regression, adjusting for clinician characteristics, study year, and medical center. SUBJECTS: Adult primary care clinicians in a large Integrated Delivery System. MEASURES: Three measures of clinician-reported care coordination for patient care transferred across clinicians (eg, from specialist to primary care team) and across delivery sites (eg, from the hospital to outpatient care).

resultsOutpatient EHR use was associated with higher reports of access to complete and timely clinical information and higher agreement on clinician roles and responsibilities for patients transferred across clinicians, but not for patients transferred across delivery sites. Use of the integrated outpatient-inpatient EHR was associated with higher reports of access to timely and complete clinical information, clinician agreement on the patient's treatment plan for patients transferred across delivery sites, and with all coordination measures for patients transferred across clinicians.

conclusionUse of an integrated EHR with health information exchange across delivery settings improved patient care coordination.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Information ExchangeAdultContinuity of Patient CareElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMeaningful UseMiddle AgedQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID25304020
PMCPMC5131789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.