ArticleBMC health services research2014
Talking about quality: exploring how 'quality' is conceptualized in European hospitals and healthcare systems.
Article in BMC health services research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Crush injury syndrome in earthquakes: a systematic review and meta-analysis on its frequency and complications.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Pooled it
- The Challenge of Public Participation in European Hospitals: A Portuguese Case Study.Portuguese journal of public health · 2026Article
- Multilevel Conceptualization and Measurement of Person-Centeredness.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026Article
- The conceptualization of champions and their role in healthcare resilience.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Risk Management of Medication Errors: Improving the Quality of Pharmacotherapeutic Practice.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2025Article
- Identifying, categorising, and mapping actors involved in resilience in healthcare: a qualitative stakeholder analysis.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Leading Quality and Safety on the Frontline - A Case Study of Department Leaders in Nursing Homes.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2024Article
- Managing patient safety and staff safety in nursing homes: exploring how leaders of nursing homes negotiate their dual responsibilities-a case study.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
- The role of ambidextrous leadership and employee ambidexterity in enhancing service quality of care and creativity - a study of health professionals.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Quality of care during rural care transitions: a qualitative study on structural conditions.BMC nursing · 2023Article
- Big Data Health Care Innovations: Performance Dashboarding as a Process of Collective Sensemaking.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Have Dutch Hospitals Saved Lives and Reduced Costs? A longitudinal patient-level analysis over the years 2013-2017.Health economics · 2021Article
- Exploring managers' response to a quality and safety leadership intervention: findings from a multiple case study in Norwegian nursing homes and homecare services.BMJ open quality · 2021Article
- Pushing poverty off limits: quality improvement and the architecture of healthcare values.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- Multi-level analysis of the learning health system: Integrating contributions from research on organizations and implementation.Learning health systems · 2021Article
- Talking about quality: how 'quality' is conceptualized in nursing homes and homecare.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Disrupted Service Delivery? The Impact of Conflict on Antenatal Care Quality in Kenya.Frontiers in global women's health · 2021Article
- Multilevel influences on resilient healthcare in six countries: an international comparative study protocol.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Article
- Enacting quality improvement in ten European hospitals: a dualities approach.BMC health services research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConceptualization of quality of care - in terms of what individuals, groups and organizations include in their meaning of quality, is an unexplored research area. It is important to understand how quality is conceptualised as a means to successfully implement improvement efforts and bridge potential disconnect in language about quality between system levels, professions, and clinical services. The aim is therefore to explore and compare conceptualization of quality among national bodies (macro level), senior hospital managers (meso level), and professional groups within clinical micro systems (micro level) in a cross-national study.
methodsThis cross-national multi-level case study combines analysis of national policy documents and regulations at the macro level with semi-structured interviews (383) and non-participant observation (803 hours) of key meetings and shadowing of staff at the meso and micro levels in ten purposively sampled European hospitals (England, the Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden, and Norway). Fieldwork at the meso and micro levels was undertaken over a 12-month period (2011-2012) and different types of micro systems were included (maternity, oncology, orthopaedics, elderly care, intensive care, and geriatrics).
resultsThe three quality dimensions clinical effectiveness, patient safety, and patient experience were incorporated in macro level policies in all countries. Senior hospital managers adopted a similar conceptualization, but also included efficiency and costs in their conceptualization of quality. 'Quality' in the forms of measuring indicators and performance management were dominant among senior hospital managers (with clinical and non-clinical background). The differential emphasis on the three quality dimensions was strongly linked to professional roles, personal ideas, and beliefs at the micro level. Clinical effectiveness was dominant among physicians (evidence-based approach), while patient experience was dominant among nurses (patient-centered care, enough time to talk with patients). Conceptualization varied between micro systems depending on the type of services provided.
conclusionThe quality conceptualization differed across system levels (macro-meso-micro), among professional groups (nurses, doctors, managers), and between the studied micro systems in our ten sampled European hospitals. This entails a managerial alignment challenge translating macro level quality definitions into different local contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.