Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25303921›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2015

Laparo-endoscopic transgastric resection of gastric submucosal tumors.

Juan S Barajas-Gamboa, Geylor Acosta, Thomas J Savides, Jason K Sicklick, Syed M Abbas Fehmi, Alisa M Coker, Shannon Green, Ryan Broderick, Diego F Nino, Cristina R Harnsberger and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Gastric sub-epithelial tumors: identification of gastrointestinal stromal tumors using CT with a practical scoring method.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Juan S Barajas-GamboaCenter for the Future of Surgery, University of California at San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92093, USA, jbarajasgamboa@gmail.com.
Geylor Acosta
Thomas J Savides
Jason K Sicklick
Syed M Abbas Fehmi
Alisa M Coker
Shannon Green
Ryan Broderick
Diego F Nino
Cristina R Harnsberger
Martin A Berducci
Bryan J Sandler
Mark A Talamini
Garth R Jacobsen
Santiago Horgan

Funding

Novel Allosteric Kinase Inhibitors Target Imatinib-Resistant GISTK08CA168999 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SICKLICK, JASON KEITH · 2014 to 2018
$888k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA168999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic and endoluminal surgical techniques have evolved and allowed improvements in the methods for treating benign and malignant gastrointestinal diseases. To date, only case reports have been reported on the application of a laparo-endoscopic approach for resecting gastric submucosal tumors (SMT). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and oncologic outcomes of a laparo-endoscopic transgastric approach to resect tumors that would traditionally require either a laparoscopic or open surgical approach. Herein, we present the largest single institution series utilizing this technique for the resection of gastric SMT in North America.

methodsWe performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected patient database. Patients who presented for evaluation of gastric SMT were offered this surgical procedure and informed consents were obtained for participation in the study.

resultsFourteen patients were included in this study between August/2010 and January/2013. Eight (8) patients (57.1 %) were female and the median age was 56 years (range 29-78). Of the 14 cases, 8 patients (57.1 %) underwent laparo-endoscopic resection of SMTs with transgastric extraction, 5 patients (35.7 %) had conversions to traditional laparoscopic surgery, and 1 patient (7.2 %) was abandoned intraoperatively. The median operative time for this cohort was 80 min (range 35-167). Ten patients (71.4 %) had GISTs, 3 (21.4 %) had leiomyomas, and 1 (7.1 %) had schwannoma. There were no intraoperative complications. Two patients had postoperative staple line bleeding that required repeat endoscopy. The median hospital stay was 1 day (range 1-6) and there were no postoperative mortalities. At 12-month follow-up visit, only one GIST patient (10 %) had tumor recurrence.

conclusionOur experience suggests that this surgical approach is safe and efficient in the resection of gastric SMT with transgastric extraction. This study found no intraoperative complications and optimal oncologic outcomes during the follow-up period. Minimally invasive surgical approaches are emerging as a valid and potentially better approach for resecting malignancies; however, continued investigation is underway to further validate this data.

Indexed as

GastroscopyLaparoscopyAdultAgedFemaleGastric MucosaGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansLeiomyomaLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeurilemmomaOperative TimeRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID25303921
PMCPMC4951182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.