Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25303904›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2015

Surgical site infection after laparoscopic and open appendectomy: a multicenter large consecutive cohort study.

Yan Xiao, Gang Shi, Jin Zhang, Jian-Guo Cao, Li-Jun Liu, Ting-Hao Chen, Zhi-Zhou Li, Hong Wang, Han Zhang, Zhao-Fen Lin and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Is it necessary to use specimen retrieval bag for reducing surgical site infection in laparoscopic appendectomy?A randomized controlled trial.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2023
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Appendectomy in Patients with Morbid Obesity: Laparoscopic versus Conventional Technique.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Prospective Observational Study on acute Appendicitis Worldwide (POSAW).World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2018
    Observational
  18. Article
  19. Pediatric appendicitis: state of the art review.Pediatric surgery international · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Yan XiaoDepartment of Emergency, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China.
Gang Shi
Jin Zhang
Jian-Guo Cao
Li-Jun Liu
Ting-Hao Chen
Zhi-Zhou Li
Hong Wang
Han Zhang
Zhao-Fen Lin
Jun-Hua Lu
Tian Yang
Second Military Medical University · CNAffiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College · CNEastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital · CNLiuyang City Maternal and Child Health Hospital · CNSoochow University · CNZhangjiagang First People's Hospital · CNZigong First People's Hospital · CNZoucheng People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has been rapidly applied worldwide recently. The issue of surgical site infection (SSI) after appendectomy needs to be re-investigated and analyzed along with this trend. This study aimed to identify risk factors of SSI after appendectomy in recent years.

methodsThis retrospective study was conducted among patients with acute appendicitis who underwent either laparoscopic or open appendectomy (OA) at 7 general hospitals in China from 2010 to 2013. The incidence of SSI, classified as incisional SSI and organ/space SSI, was investigated. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to assess independent risk factors associated with overall, incisional, and organ/space SSI, respectively.

resultsAmong 16,263 consecutive patients, 3,422 (21.0 %) and 12,841 (79.0 %) patients underwent LA and OA, respectively. The incidences of overall, incisional, and organ/space SSI were 6.2, 3.7, and 3.0 %, respectively. The proportion of LAs among both procedures increased yearly from 5.3 to 46.5 %, while the incidences of overall and incisional SSI after appendectomy simultaneously decreased yearly from 9.6 to 4.5 % and from 6.7 to 2.2 %, respectively. In comparison with OA, LA was associated with lower incidences of overall and incisional SSI (4.5 vs 6.7 %, P < 0.001; and 1.9 vs 4.2 %, P < 0.001), but a similar incidence of organ/space SSI (3.0 vs 3.0 %, P = 0.995). After multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed, LA was found to be independently associated with a decrease in development of overall SSI [odds ratio (95 % confidence interval) OR (95 % CI), 1.24 (1.03-1.70); P = 0.04] or incisional SSI [OR (95 % CI), 1.32 (1.10-1.68); P = 0.01].

conclusionWith the increasing application trends of laparoscopic procedure, the incidence of SSI after appendectomy declined accordingly. Compared with OA, LA was independently associated with a significantly lower incidence of incisional SSI, but a similar incidence of organ/space SSI.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAppendectomyAppendicitisChildChild, PreschoolChinaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantLaparoscopyLogistic Models

Identifiers

PMID25303904
OpenAlexW2073285584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.