Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25303516›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology2015

Local and systemic effects of cat allergen nasal provocation.

G W Scadding, A Eifan, M Penagos, A Dumitru, A Switzer, O McMahon, D Phippard, A Togias, S R Durham, M H Shamji

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. [Chinese expert consensus on the evaluation of allergen-specific immunotherapy outcomes(Wuhan, 2025)].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Characterizing the symptomatology and pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis using a nasal allergen challenge model - a subset of the allergic rhinitis microbiome study.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Development of nasal allergen challenge with cockroach in children with asthma.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2021
    Article
  13. Mechanisms of Allergen Immunotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Local and systemic effects of cat allergen nasal provocation.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

G W ScaddingAllergy and Clinical Immunology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
A Eifan
M Penagos
A Dumitru
A Switzer
O McMahon
D Phippard
A Togias
S R Durham
M H Shamji
Imperial College London · GBImmune Tolerance Network · USNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCat allergen is widely distributed in homes and schools; allergic sensitization is common.

objectiveTo develop a model of cat allergen nasal challenge to establish dose-response and time-course characteristics and investigate local and systemic biomarkers of allergic inflammation.

methodsNineteen cat-allergic individuals underwent titrated nasal challenge, range 0.243 to 14.6 μg/mL Fel d1, and matched diluent-only provocation. Clinical response to 8 h was assessed by symptom scores and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF). Nasal fluid was collected using polyurethane sponges and analysed by ImmunoCAP and multiplex assays. Whole blood flow cytometry for basophil surface CD63, CD107a, and CD203c was carried out at baseline and 6 h post-challenge.

resultsA dose-response to allergen was seen in symptom scores and PNIF, maximal at 10 000 BU/mL (4.87 μg/mL Fel d1), P < 0.0001 vs. diluent. Nasal fluid tryptase was elevated at 5 min after challenge (P < 0.05 vs. diluent); eotaxin, IL-4, -5, -9, and -13 were increased at 8 h (P < 0.05 to P < 0.0001 vs. diluent); TSLP was undetectable; IL-10, IL-17A, and IL-33 were unchanged compared to diluent challenge. Nasal fluid IL-5 and IL-13 correlated inversely with PNIF after challenge (IL-5, r = -0.79, P < 0.0001; IL-13, r = -0.60, P = 0.006). Surface expression of CD63 and CD107a was greater at 6 h than at baseline, both in the presence (both P < 0.05) and absence (CD63, P < 0.01; CD107a, P < 0.05) of in vitro allergen stimulation; no changes were seen on diluent challenge day.

conclusionsCat allergen nasal challenge produces local and systemic Th2-driven inflammatory responses and has potential as a surrogate outcome measure in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Nasal Provocation TestsAdultAllergensAnimalsBasophilsBiomarkersCatsCytokinesFemaleHumansHypersensitivityImmunoglobulin EImmunophenotypingLeukocyte CountMaleMiddle AgedAllergensBiomarkersCytokinesImmunoglobulin Ebasophilcat allergycytokinenasal allergen challengetryptase

Identifiers

PMID25303516
PMCPMC4778413
OpenAlexW1967883194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.